FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.80B
5Y Perf.-23.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FBIN vs SHW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$79.82B
5Y Perf.+63.5%
FBIN vs SHW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FBIN | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $4.80B | $79.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.49B | $23.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $328M | $2.60B |
| Gross Margin | 45.1% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.8% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 27.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.83B | $14.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $381M | $207M |
FBIN vs SHW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FBIN
SHW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 76.6 | -23.4% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIN vs SHW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SHW leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Defensive Pick
FBIN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, current ratio 1.25x
- PEG 2.83 vs SHW's 3.98
- Beta 1.61, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.25x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Income Pick
SHW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 255.1% 10Y total return vs FBIN's 0.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHW | 2.1% revenue growth vs FBIN's -0.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.8x vs 27.6x), PEG 2.83 vs 3.98 |
| Quality / Margins | SHW | 10.9% margin vs FBIN's 7.3% |
| Stability / Safety | SHW | Beta 0.79 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHW | -7.3% vs FBIN's -22.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SHW | 10.0% ROA vs FBIN's 5.0%, ROIC 16.5% vs 11.5% |
FBIN vs SHW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FBIN vs SHW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSHWLAGGINGFBIN
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
SHWThe Sherwin-Williams …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SHW6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN7/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SHW5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHW6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SHW2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.9B annually — 5.3x FBIN's $4.5B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.9% (SHW) to 7.3% (FBIN). On growth, SHW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.5B | $23.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $771M | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $328M | $2.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $455M | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.1% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.3% | +10.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.9% | +7.5% |
SHW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 66% valuation discount to SHW's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIN offers better value at 2.57x vs SHW's 4.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $79.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.2B | $94.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.65x | 31.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.75x | 27.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.57x | 4.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 21.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.04x | 3.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.07x | 17.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.11x | 30.07x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $14 for FBIN. FBIN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHW's 3.16x.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | +58.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.5% | +16.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.3% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | 3.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $14.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $381M | $207M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.58x | 7.83x |
SHW leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHW five years ago would be worth $11,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,770 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, SHW leads with a -7.3% total return vs FBIN's -22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHW at 12.9% vs FBIN's -13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.1% | -1.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.5% | -7.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.0% | +43.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | +18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +255.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.4% | +12.9% |
SHW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHW currently trades 85.2% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.84 | $379.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.07 | $301.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.6% | +85.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 1.6M |
SHW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIN as "Hold" and SHW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.8% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 20.3% for SHW (target: $389). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.38% vs SHW's 0.98%.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.83 | $389.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.95 | $3.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.0% | 0.0% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
SHW leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallThe Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FBIN vs SHW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIN or SHW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger pick with 2.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 4% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIN or SHW?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. wins at 2. 83x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 98x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIN or SHW?
Over the past 5 years, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) delivered a total return of +18.
1%, compared to -52. 3% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +255. 1% versus FBIN's +0. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIN or SHW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 103% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 117% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBIN or SHW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is pulling ahead at 2.
1% versus -0. 4% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. grew EPS 18. 3% year-over-year, compared to -2. 7% for The Sherwin-Williams Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBIN or SHW?
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus 10. 2% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHW leads at 16. 1% versus 16. 0% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBIN or SHW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 83x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 98x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 6x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 49. 8% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBIN or SHW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
09Is FBIN or SHW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 0% yield, +255. 1% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +255. 1%, FBIN: +0. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBIN and SHW?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBIN (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FBIN: -0.5% · SHW: 6.8%)Net Margin>
%
(FBIN: 7.3% · SHW: 10.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FBIN: 10.6x · SHW: 31.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.