Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBP vs HBAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBP vs HBAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.78B | $26.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $12.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $345M | $2.21B |
| Gross Margin | 72.9% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 33.2% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $18.48B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $1.78B |
FBP vs HBAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 443.9 | +343.9% |
| Huntington Bancshar… (HBAN) | 100 | 187.2 | +87.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBP vs HBAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 18.8%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs HBAN's 124.0%
In this particular matchup, HBAN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% NII/revenue growth vs HBAN's 4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 11.4x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.76 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HBAN's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs HBAN's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs HBAN's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs HBAN's +16.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs HBAN's 0.4% |
FBP vs HBAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBP vs HBAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBP leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HBAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.5B annually — 9.9x FBP's $1.3B. FBP is the more profitable business, keeping 27.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HBAN's 17.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $12.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $3.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $345M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $440M | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.9% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | -11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FBP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 6% valuation discount to HBAN's 12.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs HBAN's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $26.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $43.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.29x | 11.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.97x | 11.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 0.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.37x | 16.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.01x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.71x | 11.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBP delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for HBAN. FBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HBAN's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs HBAN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$293M | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $18.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $20,624 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,551 for HBAN. Over the past 12 months, FBP leads with a +25.0% total return vs HBAN's +16.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBP at 33.8% vs HBAN's 23.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | +16.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.6% | +89.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +25.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +640.3% | +124.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.8% | +23.8% |
Risk & Volatility
FBP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBP is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBAN's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HBAN's 85.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.57 | $19.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $14.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 24.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBP and HBAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBP as "Buy" and HBAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for HBAN (target: $20) vs 5.0% for FBP (target: $26). For income investors, HBAN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs FBP's 2.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $20.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | 0.0% |
FBP leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
FBP vs HBAN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBP or HBAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBP or HBAN?
On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated at 12. 0x. On forward P/E, First BanCorp. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or HBAN?
Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.
(FBP) delivered a total return of +106. 2%, compared to +25. 5% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +640. 3% versus HBAN's +124. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBP or HBAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 1. 09β — meaning HBAN is approximately 37% more volatile than FBP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First BanCorp. (FBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 76% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBP or HBAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First BanCorp.
(FBP) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus 4. 4% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First BanCorp. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to 13. 9% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBP or HBAN?
First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 4% net margin versus 17. 7% for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — meaning it keeps 27. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBP leads at 33. 2% versus 21. 5% for HBAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBP leads at 72. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBP or HBAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Huntington Bancshares Incorporated's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First BanCorp. (FBP) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Huntington Bancshares Incorporated — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HBAN: 22. 5% to $20. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBP or HBAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (HBAN) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 3. 0% for First BanCorp. (FBP).
09Is FBP or HBAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +640. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +640. 3%, HBAN: +124. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBP and HBAN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.