Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBP vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
FBP vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3.77B | $617.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $345M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 72.9% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | 33.2% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $20.15B |
FBP vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 442.2 | +342.2% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.9 | +64.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBP vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs V's 334.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs V's 1.56
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.30 vs 1.56 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FBP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs FBP's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.6% vs V's -6.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs FBP's 0.4% |
FBP vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBP vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 31.8x FBP's $1.3B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBP's 27.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $345M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $440M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.9% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FBP leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 64% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $617.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $622.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.25x | 31.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.93x | 24.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.34x | 24.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.00x | 15.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 16.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.68x | 28.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $18 for FBP. FBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$293M | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $21,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,474 for V. Over the past 12 months, FBP leads with a +23.6% total return vs V's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBP at 32.3% vs V's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.7% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.6% | -6.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.6% | +41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +44.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +648.0% | +334.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBP's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs V's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.51 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +85.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 62.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBP as "Buy" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.6% upside for V (target: $362) vs 5.4% for FBP (target: $26). For income investors, FBP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.97% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +2.2% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FBP vs V: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBP or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBP or V?
On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, First BanCorp. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or V?
Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.
(FBP) delivered a total return of +110. 2%, compared to +44. 7% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +648. 0% versus V's +334. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBP or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus First BanCorp. 's 0. 79β — meaning FBP is approximately 17% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First BanCorp. (FBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBP or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First BanCorp. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBP or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 27. 4% for First BanCorp. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 33. 2% for FBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBP or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First BanCorp. (FBP) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Visa Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 12. 6% to $362. 45.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBP or V?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).
09Is FBP or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +648. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +648. 0%, V: +334. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBP and V?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBP is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.