Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FBP vs V

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FBP
First BanCorp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.77B
5Y Perf.+342.2%
V
Visa Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$617.80B
5Y Perf.+64.9%

FBP vs V — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FBP logoFBP
V logoV
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$3.77B$617.80B
Revenue (TTM)$1.26B$40.00B
Net Income (TTM)$345M$22.24B
Gross Margin72.9%80.4%
Operating Margin33.2%60.0%
Forward P/E10.9x24.6x
Total Debt$364M$25.17B
Cash & Equiv.$657M$20.15B

FBP vs VLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FBP
V
StockMay 20May 26Return
First BanCorp. (FBP)100442.2+342.2%
Visa Inc. (V)100164.9+64.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FBP vs V

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: V leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. First BanCorp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FBP
First BanCorp.
The Banking Pick

FBP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs V's 334.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
  • PEG 0.30 vs V's 1.56
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
V
Visa Inc.
The Banking Pick

V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
  • 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthV logoV11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3%
ValueFBP logoFBPLower P/E (10.9x vs 24.6x), PEG 0.30 vs 1.56
Quality / MarginsV logoVEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs FBP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyV logoVBeta 0.68 vs FBP's 0.79
DividendsFBP logoFBP3.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)FBP logoFBP+23.6% vs V's -6.9%
Efficiency (ROA)V logoVEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs FBP's 0.4%

FBP vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FBPFirst BanCorp.
FY 2025
Consumer (Retail) Banking Segment
67.9%$679M
Commercial and Corporate Segment
18.2%$182M
United States Operations Segment
9.1%$91M
Mortgage Banking
8.6%$86M
Virgin Islands Operations Segment
7.5%$75M
Treasury and Investments Segment
-11.2%$-112,312,000
VVisa Inc.
FY 2025
Data Processing Revenues
50.0%$20.0B
Service
43.8%$17.5B
International Transaction Revenues
35.4%$14.2B
Service, Other
10.1%$4.1B
Client Incentives
-39.4%$-15,751,000,000

FBP vs V — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFBPLAGGINGV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 31.8x FBP's $1.3B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBP's 27.4%.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$40.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$433M$27.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$345M$22.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$440M$21.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.9%+80.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+33.2%+60.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+27.4%+50.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+34.5%+53.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.6%+35.3%
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FBP leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.3x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 64% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
Market CapShares × price$3.8B$617.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.5B$622.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.25x31.57x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.93x24.65x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.31x1.99x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x24.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.00x15.45x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.98x16.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.68x28.63x
FBP leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $18 for FBP. FBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+18.4%+58.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%+22.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.7%+29.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.9%+36.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–995
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$293M$5.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$657M$20.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$364M$25.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.64x26.72x
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FBP five years ago would be worth $21,019 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,474 for V. Over the past 12 months, FBP leads with a +23.6% total return vs V's -6.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBP at 32.3% vs V's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+16.7%-6.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.6%-6.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+131.6%+41.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+110.2%+44.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+648.0%+334.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.3%+12.4%
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBP's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs V's 85.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.79x0.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.51$375.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.16$293.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+85.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.962.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M7.0M
Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FBP as "Buy" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.6% upside for V (target: $362) vs 5.4% for FBP (target: $26). For income investors, FBP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.97% vs V's 0.73%.

MetricFBP logoFBPFirst BanCorp.V logoVVisa Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.50$362.45
# AnalystsCovering analysts1661
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.0%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises915
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72$2.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.1%+2.2%
Evenly matched — FBP and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst BanCorp. (FBP)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FBP vs V: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FBP or V a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Visa Inc.

(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FBP or V?

On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.

(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, First BanCorp. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or V?

Over the past 5 years, First BanCorp.

(FBP) delivered a total return of +110. 2%, compared to +44. 7% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +648. 0% versus V's +334. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FBP or V?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.

(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus First BanCorp. 's 0. 79β — meaning FBP is approximately 17% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First BanCorp. (FBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FBP or V?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.

(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First BanCorp. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FBP or V?

Visa Inc.

(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 27. 4% for First BanCorp. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 33. 2% for FBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FBP or V more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 56x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First BanCorp. (FBP) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Visa Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 12. 6% to $362. 45.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FBP or V?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Visa Inc. (V).

09

Is FBP or V better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.

(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +648. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +648. 0%, V: +334. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FBP and V?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FBP is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FBP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

V

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FBP and V on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FBP: 5.3% · V: 11.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(FBP: 27.4% · V: 50.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FBP: 11.3x · V: 31.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.