Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3.78B | $611.60B | $435.43B | $220.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.26B | $40.00B | $32.79B | $80.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $345M | $22.24B | $15.57B | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 72.9% | 80.4% | 83.4% | 83.2% |
| Operating Margin | 33.2% | 60.0% | 59.2% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.0x | 24.4x | 25.1x | 18.3x |
| Total Debt | $364M | $25.17B | $19.00B | $57.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $657M | $20.15B | $10.57B | $47.71B |
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First BanCorp. (FBP) | 100 | 443.9 | +343.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| American Express Co… (AXP) | 100 | 338.6 | +238.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs AXP's 430.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 6.85x
- PEG 0.30 vs V's 1.54
- Beta 0.79, yield 3.0%, current ratio 6.85x
V is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7%
MA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3%
- Beta 0.67 vs AXP's 1.24
AXP is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 5.8% vs FBP's 4.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs FBP's 5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 18.3x), PEG 0.30 vs 0.56 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs AXP's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs AXP's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.0% vs MA's -11.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% |
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories
V leads 1 • MA leads 1 • AXP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.5B annually — 64.0x FBP's $1.3B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AXP's 13.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $40.0B | $32.8B | $80.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $433M | $27.6B | $21.6B | $18.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $345M | $22.2B | $15.6B | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $440M | $21.2B | $17.7B | $14.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.9% | +80.4% | +83.4% | +83.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +60.0% | +59.2% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +50.1% | +45.6% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +53.9% | +51.6% | +19.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.6% | +35.3% | +21.2% | +17.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FBP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, FBP trades at a 64% valuation discount to V's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBP offers better value at 0.31x vs V's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $611.6B | $435.4B | $220.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $616.6B | $443.9B | $230.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.29x | 31.25x | 29.78x | 20.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.97x | 24.40x | 25.09x | 18.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.31x | 1.97x | 1.42x | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.37x | 24.46x | 21.61x | 14.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.01x | 15.29x | 13.28x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 16.53x | 57.03x | 6.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.71x | 28.35x | 25.75x | 13.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $18 for FBP. FBP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBP scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | +58.9% | +2.1% | +33.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +22.7% | +29.5% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.7% | +29.2% | +56.5% | +12.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +36.2% | +64.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.66x | 2.45x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$293M | $5.0B | $8.4B | $10.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $657M | $20.2B | $10.6B | $47.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $364M | $25.2B | $19.0B | $57.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.64x | 26.72x | 27.23x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXP five years ago would be worth $21,335 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,434 for MA. Over the past 12 months, FBP leads with a +25.0% total return vs MA's -11.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBP at 33.8% vs MA's 9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | -7.8% | -12.3% | -13.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.0% | -7.6% | -11.4% | +18.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.6% | +40.2% | +29.8% | +116.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +42.0% | +34.3% | +113.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +640.3% | +328.6% | +428.0% | +430.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.8% | +11.9% | +9.1% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBP and MA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXP's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FBP currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs MA's 81.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.68x | 0.67x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.57 | $375.51 | $601.77 | $387.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.16 | $293.89 | $480.50 | $273.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +84.9% | +81.7% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 56.8 | 44.7 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 7.0M | 3.2M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBP and V and AXP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBP as "Buy", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy", AXP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 33.5% upside for MA (target: $657) vs 5.0% for FBP (target: $26). For income investors, FBP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.96% vs MA's 0.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $25.50 | $362.45 | $656.87 | $373.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 61 | 64 | 57 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +0.7% | +0.6% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 15 | 14 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $2.36 | $3.07 | $3.26 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.1% | +2.2% | +2.7% | +2.6% |
FBP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). V leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FBP vs V vs MA vs AXP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBP or V or MA or AXP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First BanCorp. (FBP) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
On trailing P/E, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, First BanCorp. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First BanCorp. wins at 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
Over the past 5 years, American Express Company (AXP) delivered a total return of +113.
3%, compared to +34. 3% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBP returned +640. 3% versus V's +328. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus American Express Company's 1. 24β — meaning AXP is approximately 85% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First BanCorp. (FBP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus 5. 3% for First BanCorp. (FBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastercard Incorporated grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 13. 5% for American Express Company — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 17. 1% for AXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBP or V or MA or AXP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First BanCorp. (FBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First BanCorp. (FBP) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Mastercard Incorporated — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MA: 33. 5% to $656. 87.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBP or V or MA or AXP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First BanCorp. (FBP) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 0. 6% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA).
09Is FBP or V or MA or AXP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First BanCorp.
(FBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield, +640. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBP: +640. 3%, AXP: +430. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBP and V and MA and AXP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBP is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; AXP is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.