FCN vs ICFI vs HURN vs FORR

For growth investors, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ICF International, Inc.

(ICFI) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. at 21. 4x. On forward P/E, Forrester Research, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ICF International, Inc. wins at 0. 92x versus FTI Consulting, Inc. 's 2. 23x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -85. 9% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCN returned +294. 4% versus FORR's -75. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FTI Consulting, Inc.

(FCN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Huron Consulting Group Inc. 's 0. 82β — meaning HURN is approximately 821% more volatile than FCN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FTI Consulting, Inc. (FCN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 104% for Huron Consulting Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Huron Consulting Group Inc.

(HURN) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus -8. 2% for Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTI Consulting, Inc. grew EPS 5. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1993. 3% for Forrester Research, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HURN leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

FTI Consulting, Inc.

(FCN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus -30. 1% for Forrester Research, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HURN leads at 11. 7% versus 0. 5% for FORR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FORR leads at 53. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ICF International, Inc. (ICFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 92x versus FTI Consulting, Inc. 's 2. 23x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for FTI Consulting, Inc. — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HURN: 60. 3% to $200. 00.

In this comparison, ICFI (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. FCN, HURN, FORR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, FTI Consulting, Inc.

(FCN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), +294. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCN: +294. 4%, FORR: -75. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; HURN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ICFI pays a dividend while FCN, HURN, FORR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.