Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs FUNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FDBC vs FUNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $271M | $248M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $25M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $78M |
FDBC vs FUNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs FUNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 7.1%, current ratio 33600.30x
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 33600.30x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs FDBC's 179.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs FDBC's 12.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 9.4x), PEG 0.77 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs FDBC's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.8% vs FDBC's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FUNC's 0.4% |
FDBC vs FUNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs FUNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FDBC and FUNC operate at a comparable scale, with $140M and $112M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.1% (FDBC) to 18.4% (FUNC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $25M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +18.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +20.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 22% valuation discount to FUNC's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FDBC offers better value at 0.81x vs FUNC's 1.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $248M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $357M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 12.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 1.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 11.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 12.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $13 for FUNC. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs FUNC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | $109M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $78M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,458 for FDBC. Over the past 12 months, FUNC leads with a +27.8% total return vs FDBC's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs FDBC's 6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +218.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +134.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +289.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +47.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDBC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FDBC's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $41.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $28.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FDBC and FUNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, FDBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs FUNC's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FDBC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FDBC vs FUNC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or FUNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 3% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or FUNC?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus First United Corporation at 12. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or FUNC?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -5. 4% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus FDBC's +179. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or FUNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First United Corporation (FUNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
72β versus Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FDBC is approximately 33% more volatile than FUNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or FUNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus 12. 3% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to 35. 6% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or FUNC?
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 18. 4% for First United Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 23. 6% for FDBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or FUNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 2% for First United Corporation (FUNC).
08Is FDBC or FUNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 2% yield, +289. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUNC: +289. 2%, FDBC: +179. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FDBC and FUNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.