Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $271M | $248M | $203M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $112M | $90M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $25M | $14M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 24.4% | 7.0% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.7x | 11.8x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $188M | $52M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $78M | $119M | $25M |
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 33600.30x
- 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FUNC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs CZWI's 2.32
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95
- +45.6% vs FDBC's +15.4%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs FDBC's 2.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.77 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FDBC's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FDBC leads 2 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FDBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $140M annually — 1.6x CZWI's $90M. FDBC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $112M | $90M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $36M | $9M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $25M | $14M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $16M | $11M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +68.8% | +54.7% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +24.4% | +7.0% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +18.4% | +16.0% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 35% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FDBC offers better value at 0.81x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $248M | $203M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $357M | $136M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 12.12x | 14.44x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.68x | 11.78x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 1.08x | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 11.52x | 15.28x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.22x | 2.25x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.39x | 1.09x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 12.18x | 19.55x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +12.5% | +7.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +5.9% | +2.0% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.5% | +0.6% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.05x | 0.28x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | $109M | -$67M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $78M | $119M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $188M | $52M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 1.01x | 0.16x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,458 for FDBC. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FDBC's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +4.4% | +21.5% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +27.8% | +45.6% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +218.6% | +160.0% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +134.5% | +71.2% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +289.2% | +157.0% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +47.1% | +37.5% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FDBC's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $41.95 | $22.62 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +91.0% | +93.2% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 11K | 40K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FDBC and FUNC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold". For income investors, FDBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.2% | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $0.82 | $0.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% | +3.1% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FDBC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, First United Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -5. 4% for Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FDBC is approximately 107% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First United Corporation (FUNC) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB?
In this comparison, FDBC (3.
5% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDBC and FUNC and CZWI and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FDBC, FUNC, CZWI pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.