Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $271M | $248M | $203M | $176M | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $112M | $90M | $136M | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $25M | $14M | $16M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 65.5% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 54.4% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | 24.4% | 7.0% | 14.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 9.4x | 8.7x | 11.8x | 10.4x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $188M | $52M | $70M | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $148M | $78M | $119M | $25M | $599M |
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity D & D Banc… (FDBC) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDBC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.5%, current ratio 33600.30x
- 20.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
FUNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95
- +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.1% vs FDBC's 2.6%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.1% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs FDBC's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs FUNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.9% vs 5.0% |
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
FDBC leads 2 • CZWI leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 121.0x CZWI's $90M. FDBC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $112M | $90M | $136M | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $36M | $9M | $23M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $25M | $14M | $16M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $16M | $11M | $13M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.5% | +68.8% | +54.7% | +54.4% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | +24.4% | +7.0% | +14.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +18.4% | +16.0% | +11.5% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +18.2% | +11.5% | +7.8% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.6% | +20.2% | +63.0% | +120.9% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FDBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FDBC trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FDBC offers better value at 0.81x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $271M | $248M | $203M | $176M | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $357M | $136M | $221M | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.45x | 12.12x | 14.44x | 13.36x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.68x | 11.78x | 10.45x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.81x | 1.08x | 2.85x | — | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.62x | 11.52x | 15.28x | 11.58x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 2.22x | 2.25x | 1.30x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.39x | 1.09x | 0.82x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.92x | 12.18x | 19.55x | 16.57x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FDBC delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FDBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDBC scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +12.5% | +7.8% | +7.3% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +5.9% | +2.0% | +5.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +8.5% | +0.6% | +0.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 1.05x | 0.28x | 0.32x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$131M | $109M | -$67M | $45M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $148M | $78M | $119M | $25M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $188M | $52M | $70M | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 1.01x | 0.16x | 0.31x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +4.4% | +21.5% | +19.4% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +27.8% | +45.6% | +26.4% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.6% | +218.6% | +160.0% | +21.5% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.4% | +134.5% | +71.2% | +20.6% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.2% | +289.2% | +157.0% | +126.9% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.8% | +47.1% | +37.5% | +6.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and MNSB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FDBC's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.72x | 0.46x | 0.66x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.00 | $41.95 | $22.62 | $25.17 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.00 | $28.00 | $12.83 | $17.86 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.2% | +91.0% | +93.2% | +93.4% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.2 | 50.6 | 63.7 | 50.4 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 11K | 40K | 58K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FDBC and FUNC and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FUNC as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FDBC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | — | — | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.2% | +1.8% | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $0.82 | $0.37 | — | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +1.6% | +3.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FDBC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FDBC vs FUNC vs CZWI vs MNSB vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First United Corporation (FUNC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning FDBC is approximately 107% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc. (FDBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
(FDBC) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 1% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 68. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS?
In this comparison, FDBC (3.
5% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDBC or FUNC or CZWI or MNSB or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDBC and FUNC and CZWI and MNSB and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FDBC (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FDBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. FDBC, FUNC, CZWI, FIS pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.