Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $700M | $243M | $657M | $199M | $3.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $159M | $97M | $90M | $40M | $547M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $-12M | $130M | $28M | $289M |
| Gross Margin | 72.6% | 83.5% | 68.6% | 18.0% | 87.2% |
| Operating Margin | 76.1% | 77.9% | 72.7% | -4.0% | 66.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 6.5x | 40.7x | 6.1x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $231M | $469M | $456M | $473M | $2.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $20M | $14M | $106M | $57M |
FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidus Investment Co… (FDUS) | 100 | 193.4 | +93.4% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 148.9 | +48.9% |
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
| Hercules Capital, I… (HTGC) | 100 | 147.2 | +47.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 11.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 31.1%, current ratio 25.62x
- Beta 0.67, yield 11.5%, current ratio 25.62x
- 40.1% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
TPVG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HRZN's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HRZN's 0.2%
GAIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 319.3% 10Y total return vs HTGC's 171.6%
- Beta 0.53 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage
- +30.8% vs HRZN's -23.2%
HRZN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 8.4x)
- 27.8% yield, vs GAIN's 10.0%
HTGC is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 9.1% vs GAIN's 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.1% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 8.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HRZN's 0.2% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs TPVG's 0.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs GAIN's 10.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs HRZN's 0.2% |
FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GAIN leads in 3 of 6 categories
HRZN leads 2 • FDUS leads 1 • TPVG leads 0 • HTGC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTGC is the larger business by revenue, generating $547M annually — 13.7x HRZN's $40M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 72.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $159M | $97M | $90M | $40M | $547M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $99M | -$22M | $58M | $19M | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | -$12M | $130M | $28M | $289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$188M | $35M | -$82M | $67M | -$352M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.6% | +83.5% | +68.6% | +18.0% | +87.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +76.1% | +77.9% | +72.7% | -4.0% | +66.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +51.7% | +50.6% | +72.7% | -6.6% | +62.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -92.3% | -58.7% | +126.8% | +141.5% | -77.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.6% | -2.3% | +58.1% | -29.6% | -20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HRZN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 54% valuation discount to GAIN's 9.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $700M | $243M | $657M | $199M | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $861M | $691M | $1.1B | $567M | $5.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.95x | 4.91x | 9.28x | 4.30x | 8.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.18x | 6.50x | 40.66x | 6.10x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.63x | 4.84x | — | 0.18x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.16x | 9.13x | 16.82x | — | 14.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.40x | 2.50x | 7.31x | 4.97x | 5.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.68x | 1.22x | 0.60x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 5.77x | 3.51x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FDUS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. FDUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FDUS scores 5/9 vs GAIN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | -3.4% | +21.9% | +9.0% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -1.5% | +10.5% | +3.6% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +7.2% | +5.3% | -0.2% | +6.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +9.4% | +6.8% | -0.2% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 1.33x | 0.91x | 1.49x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $161M | $449M | $441M | $368M | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $20M | $14M | $106M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $231M | $469M | $456M | $473M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.36x | -1.02x | 1.58x | 0.60x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,205 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,724 for HRZN. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +30.8% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTGC at 17.9% vs HRZN's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.9% | -6.3% | +20.7% | -26.7% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.5% | +19.3% | +30.8% | -23.2% | +6.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.1% | -3.4% | +56.5% | -27.7% | +63.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | -13.5% | +72.0% | -32.8% | +46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.4% | +93.3% | +319.3% | +52.9% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.6% | -1.2% | +16.1% | -10.3% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TPVG's 0.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.83x | 0.53x | 0.70x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.09 | $7.53 | $17.14 | $8.46 | $19.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.86 | $4.48 | $13.11 | $3.80 | $13.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +79.5% | +96.3% | +53.3% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 58.3 | 69.9 | 58.5 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 301K | 504K | 371K | 1.2M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
HRZN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FDUS as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold", GAIN as "Hold", HRZN as "Hold", HTGC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs -9.1% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs HTGC's 8.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.95 | $15.00 | $6.50 | $18.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 12 | 7 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +17.1% | +10.0% | +27.8% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.13 | $1.02 | $1.66 | $1.25 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
GAIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). HRZN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
FDUS vs TPVG vs GAIN vs HRZN vs HTGC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) is the stronger pick with 40.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Gladstone Investment Corporation at 9. 3x. On forward P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +72.
0%, compared to -32. 8% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +319. 3% versus HRZN's +52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning TPVG is approximately 56% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidus Investment Corporation (FDUS) is pulling ahead at 40.
1% versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -27. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.
7% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HTGC leads at 87. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 7x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the highest yield at 27. 8%, versus 8. 6% for Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC).
09Is FDUS or TPVG or GAIN or HRZN or HTGC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 10. 0% yield, +319. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +319. 3%, TPVG: +93. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDUS and TPVG and GAIN and HRZN and HTGC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; HTGC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.