Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
GAIN vs ARCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
GAIN vs ARCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $665M | $13.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $1.15B |
| Gross Margin | 68.6% | 75.7% |
| Operating Margin | 72.7% | 69.7% |
| Forward P/E | 41.2x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $456M | $15.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $924M |
GAIN vs ARCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gladstone Investmen… (GAIN) | 100 | 150.7 | +50.7% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 129.9 | +29.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: GAIN vs ARCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
GAIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 9.9%
- 322.9% 10Y total return vs ARCC's 139.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 91.3%, current ratio 3.69x
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -23.8%
- 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 41.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% NII/revenue growth vs GAIN's -12.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 41.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.7% margin vs ARCC's 41.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ARCC's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.9% yield, vs ARCC's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.8% vs ARCC's +1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.5% ROA vs ARCC's 3.8%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.7% |
GAIN vs ARCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GAIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 35.0x GAIN's $90M. GAIN is the more profitable business, keeping 72.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARCC's 41.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $58M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$82M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.6% | +75.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +69.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +41.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +126.8% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.1% | -63.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, GAIN trades at a 9% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARCC's 13.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GAIN's 16.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $665M | $13.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $28.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.39x | 10.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 41.16x | 10.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.95x | 13.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.40x | 4.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.84x | 12.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GAIN delivers a 21.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $8 for ARCC. GAIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARCC's 1.12x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.9% | +8.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.5% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 1.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $441M | $15.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $924M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $456M | $16.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.58x | 2.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GAIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GAIN five years ago would be worth $17,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,948 for ARCC. Over the past 12 months, GAIN leads with a +31.8% total return vs ARCC's +1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GAIN at 16.5% vs ARCC's 10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.8% | +1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.9% | +35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.9% | +49.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +322.9% | +139.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.5% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
GAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GAIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARCC's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GAIN currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.14 | $23.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.11 | $17.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 79.2 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 369K | 7.5M |
Analyst Outlook
GAIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates GAIN as "Hold" and ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.2% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs -10.2% for GAIN (target: $15). For income investors, GAIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.93% vs ARCC's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $21.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.66 | $0.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GAIN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARCC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
GAIN vs ARCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is GAIN or ARCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (41. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — GAIN or ARCC?
On trailing P/E, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the cheapest at 9.
4x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 3x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — GAIN or ARCC?
Over the past 5 years, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to +49. 5% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GAIN returned +322. 9% versus ARCC's +139. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — GAIN or ARCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Ares Capital Corporation's 0. 77β — meaning ARCC is approximately 44% more volatile than GAIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 112% for Ares Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — GAIN or ARCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus -12. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ares Capital Corporation grew EPS -23. 8% year-over-year, compared to -27. 9% for Gladstone Investment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — GAIN or ARCC?
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 72.
7% net margin versus 41. 3% for Ares Capital Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GAIN leads at 72. 7% versus 69. 7% for ARCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is GAIN or ARCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 10.
0x forward P/E versus 41. 2x for Gladstone Investment Corporation — 31. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 14. 2% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — GAIN or ARCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) offers the highest yield at 9. 9%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is GAIN or ARCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Gladstone Investment Corporation (GAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 9. 9% yield, +322. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GAIN: +322. 9%, ARCC: +139. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between GAIN and ARCC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: GAIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.