Construction Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
Oil & Gas Drilling
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction Materials | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $39M | $1.60B | $3.23B | $1.43B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $638M | $1.54B | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $194M | $104M | $75M |
| Gross Margin | -40.2% | 84.9% | 62.6% | 73.2% |
| Operating Margin | -5.8% | 71.7% | 58.3% | 34.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.2x | 12.0x | 34.4x |
| Total Debt | $215K | $10.04B | $16.16B | $2.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $504M | $453M | $381M |
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5E Advanced Materia… (FEAM) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Arbor Realty Trust,… (ABR) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 60.2 | -39.8% |
| Borr Drilling Limit… (BORR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FEAM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 90.5% revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0%
ABR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.03, yield 23.5%
- 197.3% 10Y total return vs BXMT's 50.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, current ratio 3.53x
- Beta 1.03, yield 23.5%, current ratio 3.53x
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.74 vs BORR's 1.55
BORR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth -46.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.0%
- +250.3% vs FEAM's -67.4%
- 2.1% ROA vs FEAM's -44.4%, ROIC 8.0% vs -50.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 90.5% revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 34.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.4% margin vs FEAM's -365.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs BORR's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 23.5% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs BXMT's 9.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +250.3% vs FEAM's -67.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs FEAM's -44.4%, ROIC 8.0% vs -50.2% |
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABR leads in 2 of 6 categories
BORR leads 2 • BXMT leads 1 • FEAM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 215.4x FEAM's $7M. ABR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FEAM's -3.7%. On growth, ABR holds the edge at +88.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $638M | $1.5B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $510M | $948M | $502M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | $194M | $104M | $75M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | $436M | $335M | -$58M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -40.2% | +84.9% | +62.6% | +73.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.8% | +71.7% | +58.3% | +34.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +30.4% | +6.7% | +7.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.3% | +68.3% | +21.8% | -5.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +88.5% | +4.0% | +14.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.9% | -28.6% | — | +159.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FEAM and ABR and BORR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.9x trailing earnings, ABR trades at a 80% valuation discount to BORR's 34.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BORR's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABR's 24.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $1.6B | $3.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $35M | $11.1B | $18.9B | $3.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.42x | 6.92x | 29.92x | 34.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.23x | 11.98x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.14x | 16.35x | 6.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.55x | 2.12x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.21x | 0.53x | 0.93x | 1.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.46x | 11.71x | 11.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BORR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BORR delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-50 for FEAM. FEAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABR scores 6/9 vs BORR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.4% | +6.2% | +2.9% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.4% | +1.4% | +0.5% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -50.2% | +2.3% | +4.3% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.7% | +3.0% | +11.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 3.19x | 4.61x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $9.5B | $15.7B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $504M | $453M | $381M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215,000 | $10.0B | $16.2B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.75x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 1.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BORR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BORR five years ago would be worth $32,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22 for FEAM. Over the past 12 months, BORR leads with a +250.3% total return vs FEAM's -67.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.0% vs FEAM's -75.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.9% | +6.5% | +0.7% | +46.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.4% | -10.2% | +12.1% | +250.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +4.8% | +48.1% | -12.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -11.3% | -4.1% | +226.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +197.3% | +50.5% | -68.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.1% | +1.6% | +14.0% | -4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BXMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BXMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BORR's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs FEAM's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.03x | 0.74x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.50 | $12.58 | $20.67 | $6.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $7.11 | $17.67 | $1.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +64.9% | +92.6% | +92.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 61.5 | 47.5 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 233K | 3.2M | 1.4M | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
ABR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABR as "Buy", BXMT as "Hold", BORR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for ABR (target: $8) vs -2.6% for BORR (target: $6). For income investors, ABR offers the higher dividend yield at 23.51% vs BORR's 0.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.00 | — | $5.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 18 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +23.5% | +9.9% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.92 | $1.89 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.7% | +3.4% | +0.0% |
ABR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). BORR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FEAM vs ABR vs BXMT vs BORR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) is the stronger pick with 1.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
On trailing P/E, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
(ABR) is the cheapest at 6. 9x versus Borr Drilling Limited at 34. 4x. On forward P/E, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
Over the past 5 years, Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) delivered a total return of +226.
8%, compared to -99. 8% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABR returned +197. 3% versus FEAM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Borr Drilling Limited's 1. 55β — meaning BORR is approximately 108% more volatile than BXMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, 5E Advanced Materials Inc. (FEAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) is pulling ahead at 1.
0% versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -234. 7% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BORR leads at 32. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
(ABR) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 2% net margin versus -365. 0% for 5E Advanced Materials Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXMT leads at 71. 6% versus -581. 1% for FEAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ABR leads at 90. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
(ABR) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABR: -2. 1% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR?
In this comparison, ABR (23.
5% yield), BXMT (9. 9% yield), BORR (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FEAM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FEAM or ABR or BXMT or BORR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 9. 9% yield). Borr Drilling Limited (BORR) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BXMT: +50. 5%, BORR: -68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FEAM and ABR and BXMT and BORR?
These companies operate in different sectors (FEAM (Basic Materials) and ABR (Real Estate) and BXMT (Real Estate) and BORR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FEAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BORR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ABR, BXMT pay a dividend while FEAM, BORR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.