Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $12M | $2.92T | $1.04T | $48.63B | $145.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $148M | $742.78B | $703.06B | $11.60B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $90.80B | $22.91B | $2.04B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 50.6% | 24.9% | 72.0% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.0% | 11.5% | 4.1% | 19.6% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.8x | 44.7x | 17.4x | 60.9x |
| Total Debt | $26M | $152.99B | $67.09B | $7.38B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $86.81B | $10.73B | $1.87B | $1.53B |
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 250.9 | +150.9% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 259.5 | +159.5% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, FEBO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- PEG 1.24 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (34.8x vs 60.9x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.08
- 11.5% ROA vs FEBO's -1.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.7%
WMT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SHOP's 41.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12 vs SHOP's 2.64
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- 17.6% margin vs FEBO's -0.9%
- 1.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 30.1% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.8x vs 60.9x), PEG 1.24 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs FEBO's -0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.2% vs FEBO's -16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs FEBO's -1.3%, ROIC 14.7% vs -7.7% |
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 1 of 6 categories
FEBO leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • AMZN leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 5006.7x FEBO's $148M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FEBO's -0.9%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $148M | $742.8B | $703.1B | $11.6B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $550,285 | $155.9B | $42.8B | $2.6B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $90.8B | $22.9B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$2.5B | $15.3B | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +50.6% | +24.9% | +72.0% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +11.5% | +4.1% | +19.6% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +12.2% | +3.3% | +17.6% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -0.3% | +2.2% | +14.5% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.9% | +16.6% | +5.8% | +19.5% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | +74.8% | +35.1% | +5.7% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FEBO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 79% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $2.92T | $1.04T | $48.6B | $145.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $2.98T | $1.09T | $54.1B | $143.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.17x | 37.82x | 47.69x | 24.52x | 118.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.77x | 44.71x | 17.40x | 60.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x | 4.33x | — | 4.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.47x | 24.85x | 21.03x | 95.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 4.07x | 1.46x | 4.38x | 12.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.10x | 7.14x | 10.45x | 10.61x | 10.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x | 24.97x | 29.28x | 72.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMZN and EBAY and SHOP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-0 for FEBO. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs FEBO's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.3% | +23.3% | +22.3% | +44.1% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.3% | +11.5% | +7.9% | +11.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | +14.7% | +14.7% | +16.8% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.0% | +15.3% | +17.5% | +17.4% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 1.60x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $66.2B | $56.4B | $5.5B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $86.8B | $10.7B | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $26M | $153.0B | $67.1B | $7.4B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.00x | 39.96x | 11.85x | 10.52x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,500 for FEBO. Over the past 12 months, EBAY leads with a +54.2% total return vs FEBO's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs FEBO's -37.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.3% | +19.7% | +15.7% | +22.6% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.5% | +43.7% | +32.7% | +54.2% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +156.2% | +160.5% | +137.4% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +64.8% | +186.9% | +86.3% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +697.8% | +499.5% | +369.5% | +4123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.0% | +36.8% | +37.6% | +33.4% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FEBO and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEBO is the less volatile stock with a -0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SHOP's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.06x | 1.51x | 0.12x | 0.73x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.49 | $278.56 | $134.69 | $111.38 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.61 | $185.01 | $91.89 | $67.87 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.5% | +97.3% | +96.7% | +95.5% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 81.1 | 55.9 | 63.1 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 45.5M | 17.2M | 5.4M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMZN as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, EBAY offers the higher dividend yield at 1.08% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 | $137.04 | $109.67 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 | 64 | 68 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 37 | 7 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
EBAY leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FEBO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FEBO vs AMZN vs WMT vs EBAY vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -75. 0% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus FEBO's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
06β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately -4351% more volatile than FEBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -11. 6% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -10. 4% for FEBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc. (EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. FEBO, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FEBO or AMZN or WMT or EBAY or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FEBO and AMZN and WMT and EBAY and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (FEBO (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FEBO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WMT, EBAY pay a dividend while FEBO, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.