Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FEMY
Femasys Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$13M
5Y Perf.-94.7%
XWEL
XWELL, Inc.

Personal Products & Services

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-95.2%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$136M
5Y Perf.+40.0%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$75M
5Y Perf.-96.5%
SSKN
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-99.0%

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FEMY logoFEMY
XWEL logoXWEL
CODA logoCODA
SKIN logoSKIN
SSKN logoSSKN
IndustryMedical - Instruments & SuppliesPersonal Products & ServicesAerospace & DefenseHousehold & Personal ProductsMedical - Devices
Market Cap$13M$8M$136M$75M$6M
Revenue (TTM)$2M$29M$28M$296M$31M
Net Income (TTM)$-12M$-17M$4M$-6M$-11M
Gross Margin50.4%22.7%66.3%64.9%57.8%
Operating Margin-6.9%-32.0%17.4%-3.6%-33.3%
Forward P/E22.8x
Total Debt$5M$12M$395K$379M$16M
Cash & Equiv.$9M$3M$29M$233M$7M

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FEMY
XWEL
CODA
SKIN
SSKN
StockJun 21May 26Return
Femasys Inc. (FEMY)1005.3-94.7%
XWELL, Inc. (XWEL)1004.8-95.2%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100140.0+40.0%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)1003.5-96.5%
STRATA Skin Science… (SSKN)1001.0-99.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. XWELL, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. FEMY and SKIN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FEMY
Femasys Inc.
The Growth Play

FEMY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.8%, EPS growth 44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.9%
  • 40.8% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8%
Best for: growth exposure
XWEL
XWELL, Inc.
The Income Pick

XWEL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
  • Beta 0.89 vs SKIN's 1.71
  • 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 8.6% 10Y total return vs SKIN's -94.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
  • Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.86x
  • 14.8% margin vs FEMY's -5.2%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Value Play

SKIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
SSKN
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SSKN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFEMY logoFEMY40.8% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8%
ValueSKIN logoSKINBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs FEMY's -5.2%
Stability / SafetyXWEL logoXWELBeta 0.89 vs SKIN's 1.71
DividendsXWEL logoXWEL3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs SSKN's -94.0%
Efficiency (ROA)CODA logoCODA6.6% ROA vs FEMY's -97.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -347.4%

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FEMYFemasys Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

XWELXWELL, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
89.9%$26M
Product
10.1%$3M
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M
SSKNSTRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
FY 2024
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
63.1%$21M
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
36.9%$12M

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGSSKN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SKIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $296M annually — 124.6x FEMY's $2M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FEMY's -5.2%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2M$29M$28M$296M$31M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$16M-$8M$6M$9M-$5M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$12M-$17M$4M-$6M-$11M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M-$12M$7M$29M-$4M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.4%+22.7%+66.3%+64.9%+57.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.9%-32.0%+17.4%-3.6%-33.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-5.2%-58.2%+14.8%-2.0%-35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.8%-40.0%+24.6%+9.7%-11.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.5%-4.2%+28.8%-6.7%-21.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+101.8%-105.0%+3.0%+38.0%-5.9%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SKIN and SSKN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CODA's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 48.6x.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
Market CapShares × price$13M$8M$136M$75M$6M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8M$18M$108M$221M$15M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.91x-0.29x32.73x-3.63x-0.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.85x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.64x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple18.25x48.65x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.52x0.28x5.14x0.25x0.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.90x2.34x1.29x1.15x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.60x2.02x
Evenly matched — SKIN and SSKN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSKN. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs XWEL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%+7.2%-9.4%-8.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-97.7%-84.7%+6.6%-1.2%-35.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.5%-124.8%+11.2%-6.8%-38.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-167.9%-129.5%+8.1%-4.5%-36.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922774
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.80x0.01x6.20x3.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$5M$10M-$28M$146M$9M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$3M$29M$233M$7M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$12M$394,932$379M$16M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.00x-128.64x0.79x-4.63x
CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $97 for SSKN. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs SSKN's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 11.0% vs SSKN's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-32.5%+230.3%+27.3%-58.6%-88.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-62.6%+72.5%+78.9%-53.2%-94.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-42.7%-71.4%+36.8%-94.7%-98.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%-93.8%+55.9%-95.3%-99.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.4%-100.0%+861.1%-94.6%-99.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-16.9%-34.1%+11.0%-62.5%-75.7%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CODA and SSKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SSKN is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIN's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 70.1% from its 52-week high vs SSKN's 3.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x0.89x0.99x1.71x-0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.16$2.20$17.28$2.69$3.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.31$0.26$5.98$0.57$0.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.1%+67.6%+70.1%+21.6%+3.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.353.448.349.549.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded505K1.8M255K844K12K
Evenly matched — CODA and SSKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

XWEL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.1% upside for SKIN (target: $1) vs 15.6% for CODA (target: $14). XWEL is the only dividend payer here at 3.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFEMY logoFEMYFemasys Inc.XWEL logoXWELXWELL, Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$1.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts113
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+21.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%
XWEL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XWEL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Femasys Inc.

(FEMY) is the stronger pick with 40. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 7x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -99. 0% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus XWEL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 38β versus The Beauty Health Company's 1. 71β — meaning SKIN is approximately -546% more volatile than SSKN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Femasys Inc.

(FEMY) is pulling ahead at 40. 8% versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -38. 8% for XWELL, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FEMY leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -812. 3% for Femasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -767. 0% for FEMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKIN: 124.

1% to $1. 30.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?

In this comparison, XWEL (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. FEMY, CODA, SKIN, SSKN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 38)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSKN: -99. 6%, SKIN: -94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FEMY and XWEL and CODA and SKIN and SSKN?

These companies operate in different sectors (FEMY (Healthcare) and XWEL (Consumer Cyclical) and CODA (Industrials) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and SSKN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FEMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; XWEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XWEL pays a dividend while FEMY, CODA, SKIN, SSKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FEMY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XWEL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSKN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FEMY and XWEL and CODA and SKIN and SSKN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FEMY: 24.5% · XWEL: -4.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.