Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Personal Products & Services
Aerospace & Defense
Household & Personal Products
Medical - Devices
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Personal Products & Services | Aerospace & Defense | Household & Personal Products | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $13M | $8M | $136M | $75M | $6M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $29M | $28M | $296M | $31M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-17M | $4M | $-6M | $-11M |
| Gross Margin | 50.4% | 22.7% | 66.3% | 64.9% | 57.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | -32.0% | 17.4% | -3.6% | -33.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 22.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $12M | $395K | $379M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $3M | $29M | $233M | $7M |
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femasys Inc. (FEMY) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| XWELL, Inc. (XWEL) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 140.0 | +40.0% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| STRATA Skin Science… (SSKN) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FEMY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.8%, EPS growth 44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.9%
- 40.8% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8%
XWEL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Beta 0.89 vs SKIN's 1.71
- 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs SKIN's -94.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.86x
- 14.8% margin vs FEMY's -5.2%
SKIN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, SSKN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.8% revenue growth vs XWEL's -13.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs FEMY's -5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs SKIN's 1.71 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs SSKN's -94.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs FEMY's -97.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -347.4% |
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
XWEL leads 1 • FEMY leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • SSKN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $296M annually — 124.6x FEMY's $2M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FEMY's -5.2%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $29M | $28M | $296M | $31M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$8M | $6M | $9M | -$5M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$17M | $4M | -$6M | -$11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$12M | $7M | $29M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.4% | +22.7% | +66.3% | +64.9% | +57.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | -32.0% | +17.4% | -3.6% | -33.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -58.2% | +14.8% | -2.0% | -35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | -40.0% | +24.6% | +9.7% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.5% | -4.2% | +28.8% | -6.7% | -21.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +101.8% | -105.0% | +3.0% | +38.0% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SKIN and SSKN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CODA's 18.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 48.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $8M | $136M | $75M | $6M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8M | $18M | $108M | $221M | $15M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.91x | -0.29x | 32.73x | -3.63x | -0.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.85x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.64x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 18.25x | 48.65x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.52x | 0.28x | 5.14x | 0.25x | 0.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.90x | — | 2.34x | 1.29x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 22.60x | 2.02x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSKN. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs XWEL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | — | +7.2% | -9.4% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -97.7% | -84.7% | +6.6% | -1.2% | -35.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.5% | -124.8% | +11.2% | -6.8% | -38.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -167.9% | -129.5% | +8.1% | -4.5% | -36.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | — | 0.01x | 6.20x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $10M | -$28M | $146M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $3M | $29M | $233M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $12M | $394,932 | $379M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.00x | -128.64x | — | 0.79x | -4.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $97 for SSKN. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs SSKN's -94.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 11.0% vs SSKN's -75.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.5% | +230.3% | +27.3% | -58.6% | -88.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.6% | +72.5% | +78.9% | -53.2% | -94.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.7% | -71.4% | +36.8% | -94.7% | -98.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -93.8% | +55.9% | -95.3% | -99.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.4% | -100.0% | +861.1% | -94.6% | -99.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.9% | -34.1% | +11.0% | -62.5% | -75.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CODA and SSKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSKN is the less volatile stock with a -0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIN's 1.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 70.1% from its 52-week high vs SSKN's 3.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.89x | 0.99x | 1.71x | -0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.16 | $2.20 | $17.28 | $2.69 | $3.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.31 | $0.26 | $5.98 | $0.57 | $0.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.1% | +67.6% | +70.1% | +21.6% | +3.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 53.4 | 48.3 | 49.5 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 505K | 1.8M | 255K | 844K | 12K |
Analyst Outlook
XWEL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", SKIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 124.1% upside for SKIN (target: $1) vs 15.6% for CODA (target: $14). XWEL is the only dividend payer here at 3.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | $1.30 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 13 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +21.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XWEL leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
FEMY vs XWEL vs CODA vs SKIN vs SSKN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Femasys Inc.
(FEMY) is the stronger pick with 40. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) offers the better valuation at 32. 7x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -99. 0% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus XWEL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 38β versus The Beauty Health Company's 1. 71β — meaning SKIN is approximately -546% more volatile than SSKN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Femasys Inc.
(FEMY) is pulling ahead at 40. 8% versus -13. 8% for XWELL, Inc. (XWEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -38. 8% for XWELL, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FEMY leads at 23. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -812. 3% for Femasys Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -767. 0% for FEMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKIN: 124.
1% to $1. 30.
07Which pays a better dividend — FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN?
In this comparison, XWEL (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FEMY, CODA, SKIN, SSKN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FEMY or XWEL or CODA or SKIN or SSKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 38)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSKN: -99. 6%, SKIN: -94. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FEMY and XWEL and CODA and SKIN and SSKN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FEMY (Healthcare) and XWEL (Consumer Cyclical) and CODA (Industrials) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and SSKN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FEMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; XWEL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. XWEL pays a dividend while FEMY, CODA, SKIN, SSKN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.