FER vs PWR vs ROAD vs ACM

For growth investors, Construction Partners, Inc.

(ROAD) is the stronger pick with 54. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for Aecom (ACM). Aecom (ACM) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferrovial SE (FER) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Aecom (ACM) is the cheapest at 16.

9x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 113. 2x. On forward P/E, Aecom is actually cheaper at 11. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Construction Partners, Inc. wins at 2. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 19x.

Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.

(PWR) delivered a total return of +697. 4%, compared to +13. 0% for Aecom (ACM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +32. 3% versus ACM's +130. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aecom (ACM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

93β versus Construction Partners, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning ROAD is approximately 73% more volatile than ACM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 185% for Construction Partners, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Construction Partners, Inc.

(ROAD) is pulling ahead at 54. 2% versus 0. 2% for Aecom (ACM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aecom grew EPS 42. 7% year-over-year, compared to -72. 3% for Ferrovial SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, ROAD leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Ferrovial SE (FER) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

2% net margin versus 3. 5% for Aecom — meaning it keeps 9. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FER leads at 12. 2% versus 5. 8% for PWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FER leads at 88. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 10x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 19x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Aecom (ACM) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 67. 4x for Ferrovial SE — 55. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACM: 61. 1% to $114. 88.

In this comparison, ACM (1.

4% yield), FER (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. PWR, ROAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aecom (ACM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

93), 1. 4% yield, +130. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACM: +130. 3%, PWR: +32. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FER is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ROAD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACM is a small-cap deep-value stock. ACM pays a dividend while FER, PWR, ROAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.