Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FERG
Ferguson plc

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • GB
Market Cap$48.02B
5Y Perf.+211.3%
POOL
Pool Corporation

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.99B
5Y Perf.-29.2%
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.

Industrial - Distribution

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.54B
5Y Perf.+17.6%
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.

Residential Construction

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.84B
5Y Perf.+237.3%
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.79B
5Y Perf.+281.9%

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FERG logoFERG
POOL logoPOOL
SITE logoSITE
IBP logoIBP
BLDR logoBLDR
IndustryIndustrial - DistributionIndustrial - DistributionIndustrial - DistributionResidential ConstructionConstruction
Market Cap$48.02B$6.99B$5.54B$5.84B$8.79B
Revenue (TTM)$31.63B$5.36B$4.71B$2.95B$14.82B
Net Income (TTM)$2.07B$406M$153M$255M$292M
Gross Margin30.7%29.7%34.9%33.9%29.9%
Operating Margin9.2%10.9%5.1%12.7%4.2%
Forward P/E22.1x17.2x28.7x19.5x14.1x
Total Debt$5.97B$349M$980M$1.05B$5.65B
Cash & Equiv.$674M$105M$191M$322M$182M

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FERG
POOL
SITE
IBP
BLDR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Ferguson plc (FERG)100311.3+211.3%
Pool Corporation (POOL)10070.8-29.2%
SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE)100117.6+17.6%
Installed Building … (IBP)100337.3+237.3%
Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR)100381.9+281.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FERG and POOL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Pool Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. IBP and BLDR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FERG
Ferguson plc
The Growth Leader

FERG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and momentum.

  • 3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
  • +48.6% vs POOL's -33.9%
Best for: growth and momentum
POOL
Pool Corporation
The Income Pick

POOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 29.4%, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 1.00, yield 2.6%, current ratio 2.24x
  • Beta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SITE
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
The Growth Play

SITE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
Best for: growth exposure
IBP
Installed Building Products, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IBP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 6.5% 10Y total return vs FERG's 373.2%
  • PEG 0.80 vs SITE's 6.91
  • 8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
  • 12.2% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
BLDR
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
The Value Play

BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (14.1x vs 28.7x), PEG 1.78 vs 6.91
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFERG logoFERG3.8% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
ValueBLDR logoBLDRLower P/E (14.1x vs 28.7x), PEG 1.78 vs 6.91
Quality / MarginsIBP logoIBP8.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
Stability / SafetyPOOL logoPOOLBeta 1.00 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
DividendsPOOL logoPOOL2.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FERG's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FERG logoFERG+48.6% vs POOL's -33.9%
Efficiency (ROA)IBP logoIBP12.2% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 20.7% vs 6.4%

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FERGFerguson plc
FY 2025
United States Segment
100.0%$29.3B
POOLPool Corporation
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$5.3B
SITESiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.
FY 2025
Landscaping Products
76.9%$3.6B
Agronomic
23.1%$1.1B
IBPInstalled Building Products, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Installation
50.0%$2.8B
Insulation
30.9%$1.7B
Shower Doors Shelving And Mirrors
4.0%$219M
Other Building Products
3.3%$184M
Garage Doors
3.1%$173M
Waterproofing
2.9%$161M
Rain Gutters
2.3%$125M
Other (2)
3.5%$193M
BLDRBuilders FirstSource, Inc.
FY 2025
Specialty Building Products And Services
26.8%$4.1B
Lumber And Lumber Sheet Goods
25.5%$3.9B
Windows Doors And Millwork
25.3%$3.8B
Manufactured Products
22.5%$3.4B

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPOOLLAGGINGIBP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — POOL and IBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

FERG is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.6B annually — 10.7x IBP's $2.9B. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, POOL holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$31.6B$5.4B$4.7B$2.9B$14.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.3B$636M$382M$656M$1.2B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.1B$406M$153M$255M$292M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$1.0B$605M$246M$63M$862M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.7%+29.7%+34.9%+33.9%+29.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.2%+10.9%+5.1%+12.7%+4.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.6%+7.6%+3.2%+8.6%+2.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.2%+11.3%+5.2%+2.1%+5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.0%+6.2%+0.1%-3.5%-10.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.9%+2.1%+1.6%-21.3%-151.2%
Evenly matched — POOL and IBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.6x trailing earnings, POOL trades at a 53% valuation discount to SITE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBP offers better value at 0.92x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
Market CapShares × price$48.0B$7.0B$5.5B$5.8B$8.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$53.3B$7.2B$6.3B$6.6B$14.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.45x17.55x37.08x22.33x20.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.12x17.21x28.67x19.50x14.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.55x4.53x8.94x0.92x2.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.90x11.45x16.70x13.41x10.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.56x1.32x1.18x1.97x0.58x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share8.42x5.99x3.35x8.26x2.04x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.96x22.58x22.44x19.41x10.30x
BLDR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. POOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs BLDR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.1%+32.2%+9.1%+37.5%+6.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+11.8%+11.3%+4.6%+12.2%+2.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+18.0%+22.3%+7.3%+20.7%+6.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+22.6%+22.0%+9.6%+22.6%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966885
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.02x0.29x0.58x1.48x1.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5.3B$244M$789M$731M$5.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$674M$105M$191M$322M$182M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6.0B$349M$980M$1.1B$5.6B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense15.59x12.20x6.79x9.47x2.19x
POOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FERG and IBP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FERG five years ago would be worth $19,774 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,771 for POOL. Over the past 12 months, FERG leads with a +48.6% total return vs POOL's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs POOL's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.4%-16.6%-0.1%-18.1%-24.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+48.6%-33.9%+5.6%+34.0%-25.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.0%-42.1%-18.7%+98.3%-30.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+97.7%-52.3%-38.4%+80.6%+51.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+373.2%+145.0%+368.6%+650.1%+614.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.1%-16.6%-6.7%+25.6%-11.2%
Evenly matched — FERG and IBP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FERG and POOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

POOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FERG currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.24x1.00x1.24x1.19x1.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$271.64$345.00$168.56$349.00$151.03
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$166.04$186.95$112.23$150.83$73.40
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.8%+55.2%+74.1%+62.1%+52.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.129.736.855.042.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M764K689K344K2.4M
Evenly matched — FERG and POOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FERG as "Buy", POOL as "Buy", SITE as "Buy", IBP as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.7% upside for POOL (target: $279) vs 9.9% for FERG (target: $271). For income investors, POOL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.60% vs FERG's 1.00%.

MetricFERG logoFERGFerguson plcPOOL logoPOOLPool CorporationSITE logoSITESiteOne Landscape…IBP logoIBPInstalled Buildin…BLDR logoBLDRBuilders FirstSou…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$271.00$279.29$162.29$293.00$109.92
# AnalystsCovering analysts1421152743
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+2.6%+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015252
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.45$4.96$3.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%+5.0%+1.8%+3.0%+4.7%
POOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

POOL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). BLDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallPool Corporation (POOL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FERG vs POOL vs SITE vs IBP vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ferguson plc (FERG) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (17. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ferguson plc (FERG) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

On trailing P/E, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the cheapest at 17.

6x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Installed Building Products, Inc. wins at 0. 80x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

Over the past 5 years, Ferguson plc (FERG) delivered a total return of +97.

7%, compared to -52. 3% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +650. 1% versus POOL's +145. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

00β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 65% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pool Corporation (POOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ferguson plc (FERG) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. grew EPS 24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SITE leads at 5. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 1% for SITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 80x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 28. 7x for SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POOL: 46. 7% to $279. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR?

In this comparison, POOL (2.

6% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield), FERG (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SITE, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FERG or POOL or SITE or IBP or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Installed Building Products, Inc.

(IBP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 1. 5% yield, +650. 1% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBP: +650. 1%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FERG and POOL and SITE and IBP and BLDR?

These companies operate in different sectors (FERG (Industrials) and POOL (Industrials) and SITE (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FERG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FERG, POOL, IBP pay a dividend while SITE, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FERG

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POOL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SITE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBP

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLDR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FERG and POOL and SITE and IBP and BLDR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FERG: -2.0% · POOL: 6.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(FERG: 6.6% · POOL: 7.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FERG: 26.5x · POOL: 17.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.