Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.64B
5Y Perf.+6.4%
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.20B
5Y Perf.+161.2%
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.44B
5Y Perf.+166.1%
CBSH
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.71B
5Y Perf.+5.2%

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FFIN logoFFIN
UMBF logoUMBF
BOKF logoBOKF
CBSH logoCBSH
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$4.64B$10.20B$10.44B$7.71B
Revenue (TTM)$739M$4.44B$3.36B$2.14B
Net Income (TTM)$243M$883M$537M$566M
Gross Margin70.8%54.4%57.1%80.0%
Operating Margin36.8%20.3%19.8%34.2%
Forward P/E16.0x10.5x13.3x13.0x
Total Debt$197M$3.80B$4.45B$3.00B
Cash & Equiv.$763M$953M$1.43B$803M

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FFIN
UMBF
BOKF
CBSH
StockMay 20May 26Return
First Financial Ban… (FFIN)100106.4+6.4%
UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF)100261.2+161.2%
BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF)100266.1+166.1%
Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH)100105.2+5.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FFIN leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. UMB Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. BOKF and CBSH also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FFIN
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.09x
  • Beta 0.95, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.09x
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
UMBF
UMB Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

UMBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.

  • NIM 3.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
  • 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
  • Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.07
Best for: bank quality
BOKF
BOK Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 172.7% 10Y total return vs UMBF's 169.5%
  • +47.4% vs CBSH's -13.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
CBSH
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.1%
  • PEG 1.15 vs BOKF's 4.45
  • Beta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUMBF logoUMBF68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
ValueUMBF logoUMBFLower P/E (10.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.07
Quality / MarginsFFIN logoFFINEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyCBSH logoCBSHBeta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19
DividendsFFIN logoFFIN2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs UMBF's 1.3%
Momentum (1Y)BOKF logoBOKF+47.4% vs CBSH's -13.6%
Efficiency (ROA)FFIN logoFFINEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5%

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FFINFirst Financial Bankshares, Inc.
FY 2018
Fiduciary and Trust
43.4%$28M
Deposit Account
33.3%$22M
Mortgage Banking
23.3%$15M
UMBFUMB Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Other Financial Services
94.0%$69M
Investment Securities Gains Losses Net
42.2%$31M
Trading And Investment Banking
33.5%$25M
Deposit Account
0.2%$134,000
Credit Card
-69.9%$-51,301,000
BOKFBOK Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Fees and commissions revenue
33.8%$535M
Fiduciary and Trust
14.6%$231M
Deposit Account
7.5%$119M
Transaction card revenue
6.9%$109M
Personal trust revenue
6.5%$103M
TransFund EFT network revenue
5.8%$91M
Institutional trust & retirement plan services revenue
4.2%$67M
Other (12)
20.7%$327M
CBSHCommerce Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2022
Commission Income
54.2%$10M
Managed Account Services
45.8%$9M

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFFINLAGGINGCBSH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

UMBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6.0x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$739M$4.4B$3.4B$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$310M$1.1B$797M$796M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$243M$883M$537M$566M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$290M$985M$1.5B$570M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.8%+54.4%+57.1%+80.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.8%+20.3%+19.8%+34.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.2%+15.8%+15.6%+26.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+39.6%+22.0%+42.6%+27.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-7.7%+176.9%+1.8%+1.0%
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UMBF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.9x trailing earnings, CBSH trades at a 38% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs BOKF's 5.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
Market CapShares × price$4.6B$10.2B$10.4B$7.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$13.0B$13.5B$9.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS20.90x14.67x16.65x12.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.02x10.52x13.25x13.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.01x1.63x5.60x1.14x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.27x12.31x17.44x12.87x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.27x2.30x3.11x3.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.91x1.33x1.56x1.91x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.84x10.43x7.30x13.02x
UMBF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMBF scores 7/9 vs CBSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.3%+11.7%+8.9%+15.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.6%+1.2%+1.1%+1.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.0%+7.5%+4.1%+8.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.0%+14.4%+5.5%+2.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.12x0.49x0.80x0.79x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$566M$2.8B$3.0B$2.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$763M$953M$1.4B$803M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$197M$3.8B$4.5B$3.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.48x0.63x0.55x1.97x
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — UMBF and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +47.4% total return vs CBSH's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMBF at 35.5% vs CBSH's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.2%+15.4%+14.7%+1.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.5%+35.5%+47.4%-13.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+29.9%+148.7%+82.1%+20.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-29.0%+45.2%+62.2%-13.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+146.6%+169.5%+172.7%+104.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+9.1%+35.5%+22.1%+6.4%
Evenly matched — UMBF and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UMBF and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UMBF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMBF currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.95x1.19x1.03x0.70x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$38.74$136.11$139.73$66.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$28.11$98.16$91.35$46.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.2%+98.4%+97.0%+79.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.474.856.859.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded735K611K318K1.2M
Evenly matched — UMBF and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FFIN and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FFIN as "Hold", UMBF as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -2.9% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.20% vs UMBF's 1.32%.

MetricFFIN logoFFINFirst Financial B…UMBF logoUMBFUMB Financial Cor…BOKF logoBOKFBOK Financial Cor…CBSH logoCBSHCommerce Bancshar…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.25$150.40$131.57$58.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts15182115
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.2%+1.3%+1.7%+2.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11171112
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.72$1.77$2.24$1.08
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.3%+0.9%+2.7%
Evenly matched — FFIN and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UMBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallFirst Financial Bankshares,… (FFIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

On trailing P/E, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

(CBSH) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, UMB Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Commerce Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +62.

2%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +172. 7% versus CBSH's +104. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 69% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.

5% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

First Financial Bankshares, Inc.

(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 3% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).

09

Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.

(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +104. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +104. 0%, UMBF: +169. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FFIN and UMBF and BOKF and CBSH?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; UMBF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FFIN

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UMBF

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 34%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BOKF

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CBSH

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FFIN and UMBF and BOKF and CBSH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FFIN: 18.8% · UMBF: 68.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(FFIN: 30.2% · UMBF: 15.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FFIN: 20.9x · UMBF: 14.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.