Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $10.20B | $10.44B | $7.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $739M | $4.44B | $3.36B | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $243M | $883M | $537M | $566M |
| Gross Margin | 70.8% | 54.4% | 57.1% | 80.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.8% | 20.3% | 19.8% | 34.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 10.5x | 13.3x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $197M | $3.80B | $4.45B | $3.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $763M | $953M | $1.43B | $803M |
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
| UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF) | 100 | 261.2 | +161.2% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 266.1 | +166.1% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 0.09x
- Beta 0.95, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.09x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
UMBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.07
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 172.7% 10Y total return vs UMBF's 169.5%
- +47.4% vs CBSH's -13.6%
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.1%
- PEG 1.15 vs BOKF's 4.45
- Beta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 16.0x), PEG 1.17 vs 3.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs UMBF's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.4% vs CBSH's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% |
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
UMBF leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • CBSH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UMBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 6.0x FFIN's $739M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $739M | $4.4B | $3.4B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $310M | $1.1B | $797M | $796M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $243M | $883M | $537M | $566M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $290M | $985M | $1.5B | $570M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.8% | +54.4% | +57.1% | +80.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +20.3% | +19.8% | +34.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +15.8% | +15.6% | +26.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +22.0% | +42.6% | +27.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.7% | +176.9% | +1.8% | +1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UMBF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, CBSH trades at a 38% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs BOKF's 5.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $10.2B | $10.4B | $7.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $13.0B | $13.5B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.90x | 14.67x | 16.65x | 12.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.02x | 10.52x | 13.25x | 13.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.01x | 1.63x | 5.60x | 1.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.27x | 12.31x | 17.44x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.27x | 2.30x | 3.11x | 3.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.91x | 1.33x | 1.56x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.84x | 10.43x | 7.30x | 13.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UMBF scores 7/9 vs CBSH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +11.7% | +8.9% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +7.5% | +4.1% | +8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +14.4% | +5.5% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.49x | 0.80x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$566M | $2.8B | $3.0B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $763M | $953M | $1.4B | $803M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $197M | $3.8B | $4.5B | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.48x | 0.63x | 0.55x | 1.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UMBF and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,223 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,104 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +47.4% total return vs CBSH's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMBF at 35.5% vs CBSH's 6.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.2% | +15.4% | +14.7% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.5% | +35.5% | +47.4% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.9% | +148.7% | +82.1% | +20.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.0% | +45.2% | +62.2% | -13.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.6% | +169.5% | +172.7% | +104.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.1% | +35.5% | +22.1% | +6.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UMBF and CBSH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UMBF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMBF currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.19x | 1.03x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.74 | $136.11 | $139.73 | $66.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.11 | $98.16 | $91.35 | $46.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.2% | +98.4% | +97.0% | +79.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 74.8 | 56.8 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 735K | 611K | 318K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FFIN and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FFIN as "Hold", UMBF as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -2.9% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.20% vs UMBF's 1.32%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.25 | $150.40 | $131.57 | $58.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 18 | 21 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.3% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 17 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.72 | $1.77 | $2.24 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.3% | +0.9% | +2.7% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UMBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FFIN vs UMBF vs BOKF vs CBSH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
On trailing P/E, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 9x. On forward P/E, UMB Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Commerce Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +62.
2%, compared to -29. 0% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +172. 7% versus CBSH's +104. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 69% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.
5% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 12. 2% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 45x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 20. 4% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 3% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).
09Is FFIN or UMBF or BOKF or CBSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +104. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +104. 0%, UMBF: +169. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FFIN and UMBF and BOKF and CBSH?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; UMBF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.