Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FG vs LNC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

Insurance - Life

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.67B
5Y Perf.+17.8%
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation

Insurance - Life

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.87B
5Y Perf.-7.7%

FG vs LNC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FG logoFG
LNC logoLNC
IndustryInsurance - LifeInsurance - Life
Market Cap$3.67B$6.87B
Revenue (TTM)$5.86B$18.88B
Net Income (TTM)$530M$1.73B
Gross Margin21.0%17.0%
Operating Margin6.0%12.1%
Forward P/E6.6x4.7x
Total Debt$2.24B$6.43B
Cash & Equiv.$1.49B$9.50B

FG vs LNCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FG
LNC
StockNov 22May 26Return
F&G Annuities & Lif… (FG)100117.8+17.8%
Lincoln National Co… (LNC)10092.3-7.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FG vs LNC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LNC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FG
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

FG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 3.8%
  • Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -61.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 36.8%
  • 78.6% 10Y total return vs LNC's 24.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LNC
Lincoln National Corporation
The Insurance Pick

LNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.7x vs 6.6x)
  • Combined ratio 0.9 vs FG's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
  • 4.9% yield, vs FG's 3.8%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFG logoFG5.7% revenue growth vs LNC's 1.2%
ValueLNC logoLNCLower P/E (4.7x vs 6.6x)
Quality / MarginsLNC logoLNCCombined ratio 0.9 vs FG's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
Stability / SafetyFG logoFGBeta 1.02 vs LNC's 1.34, lower leverage
DividendsLNC logoLNC4.9% yield, vs FG's 3.8%
Momentum (1Y)LNC logoLNC+11.0% vs FG's -22.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FG logoFG0.5% ROA vs LNC's 0.4%, ROIC 5.0% vs 12.0%

FG vs LNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FGF&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$5.7B
LNCLincoln National Corporation
FY 2024
Life Segment
34.5%$6.3B
Group Protection Segment
31.4%$5.7B
Annuities Segment
26.9%$4.9B
Retirement Plan Services Segment
7.2%$1.3B

FG vs LNC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLNCLAGGINGFG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LNC is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.9B annually — 3.2x FG's $5.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 9.1% (LNC) to 9.0% (FG). On growth, FG holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.9B$18.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.4B$2.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$530M$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.8B$243M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.0%+17.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.0%+12.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.0%+9.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+82.3%+1.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+39.0%+12.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.9%+100.0%
FG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 6.2x trailing earnings, LNC trades at a 57% valuation discount to FG's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FG's 4.5x.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
Market CapShares × price$3.7B$6.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$3.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.41x6.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.60x4.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.48x2.43x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.64x0.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x0.61x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.79x
LNC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNC delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for FG. FG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNC's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FG scores 5/9 vs LNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.1%+16.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+12.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.4%+0.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.45x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$751M-$3.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.5B$9.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.2B$6.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.87x15.29x
LNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FG five years ago would be worth $17,857 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,476 for LNC. Over the past 12 months, LNC leads with a +11.0% total return vs FG's -22.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNC at 24.9% vs FG's 21.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-9.0%-18.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-22.0%+11.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.6%+95.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.6%-35.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.6%+24.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+21.1%+24.9%
Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FG is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LNC's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.02x1.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$36.70$46.82
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$20.57$31.61
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.8%+76.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.658.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded591K2.1M
Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FG as "Hold" and LNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.0% upside for LNC (target: $44) vs 14.4% for FG (target: $31). For income investors, LNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.86% vs FG's 3.83%.

MetricFG logoFGF&G Annuities & L…LNC logoLNCLincoln National …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.00$43.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts928
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+4.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.04$1.75
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — FG and LNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallLincoln National Corporation (LNC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FG vs LNC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FG or LNC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the stronger pick with 5. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) offers the better valuation at 6. 2x trailing P/E (4. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FG or LNC?

On trailing P/E, Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) is the cheapest at 6.

2x versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Lincoln National Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FG or LNC?

Over the past 5 years, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) delivered a total return of +78. 6%, compared to -35. 2% for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FG returned +78. 6% versus LNC's +24. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FG or LNC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Lincoln National Corporation's 1. 34β — meaning LNC is approximately 31% more volatile than FG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 59% for Lincoln National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FG or LNC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is pulling ahead at 5. 7% versus 1. 2% for Lincoln National Corporation (LNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. grew EPS -61. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 3% for Lincoln National Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FG leads at 36. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FG or LNC?

Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

5% net margin versus 4. 6% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNC leads at 7. 3% versus 5. 6% for FG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNC leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FG or LNC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) trades at 4.

7x forward P/E versus 6. 6x for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNC: 21. 0% to $43. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FG or LNC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 3. 8% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG).

09

Is FG or LNC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FG: +78. 6%, LNC: +24. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FG and LNC?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FG and LNC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FG: 39.0% · LNC: 12.5%)
Net Margin>
%
(FG: 9.0% · LNC: 9.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FG: 14.4x · LNC: 6.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.