Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGEN
FibroGen, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$585M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1712.35T
5Y Perf.-55.4%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.68B
5Y Perf.+195.5%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+1.3%

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGEN logoFGEN
DBVT logoDBVT
HALO logoHALO
IMVT logoIMVT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$585M$1712.35T$7.68B$5.53B
Revenue (TTM)$-118M$0.00$1.40B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$216M$-168M$317M$-464M
Gross Margin47.5%81.9%
Operating Margin-5.1%58.4%
Forward P/E8.1x
Total Debt$90M$22M$0.00$98K
Cash & Equiv.$50M$194M$134M$714M

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGEN
DBVT
HALO
IMVT
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN)1000.9-99.1%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10044.6-55.4%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100295.5+195.5%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100101.3+1.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. FibroGen, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and operational efficiency and capital deployment. DBVT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FGEN
FibroGen, Inc.
The Income Pick

FGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 0.3%
  • 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 157.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
Best for: income & stability
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Momentum Pick

DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +110.4% vs FGEN's -8.0%
Best for: momentum
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
  • 5.7% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
  • Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
  • 37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHALO logoHALO37.6% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsHALO logoHALO22.7% margin vs FGEN's -160.6%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.56 vs FGEN's 1.58
DividendsFGEN logoFGEN0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+110.4% vs FGEN's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FGEN logoFGEN157.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FGENFibroGen, Inc.
FY 2024
Drug Product Revenue
100.0%$28M
DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALOLAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO and FGEN operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and -$118M in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FGEN's -160.6%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months-$118M$0$1.4B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$123M-$112M$945M-$487M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$216M-$168M$317M-$464M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$151M$645M-$423M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.5%+81.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-5.1%+58.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-160.6%+22.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.7%+46.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-97.7%+51.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.7%+91.5%-2.1%+19.7%
HALO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FGEN and DBVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$585M$1712.35T$7.7B$5.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$625M$1712.35T$7.5B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.63x-0.76x25.46x-9.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue19.75x5.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.66x165.47x5.83x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.91x
Evenly matched — FGEN and DBVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

FGEN delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DBVT's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HALO scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.3%-130.2%+6.5%-47.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+157.4%-89.0%+12.5%-44.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+73.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-104.8%-145.7%+38.2%-66.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92452
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$40M-$172M-$134M-$714M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$50M$194M$134M$714M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$90M$22M$0$98,000
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-20.28x-189.82x46.08x
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $148 for FGEN. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs FGEN's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HALO at 29.1% vs FGEN's -74.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-18.1%+4.9%-7.3%+5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.0%+110.4%-7.1%+96.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.3%+19.7%+115.3%+40.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%-69.1%+37.0%+62.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.2%-87.0%+570.7%+173.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-74.3%+6.2%+29.1%+12.1%
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HALO and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FGEN's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs FGEN's 59.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x1.26x0.56x1.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.60$26.18$82.22$30.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.85$7.53$47.50$13.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+59.5%+76.3%+79.3%+90.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.448.152.460.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded10K252K1.4M1.4M
Evenly matched — HALO and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FGEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: FGEN as "Hold", DBVT as "Buy", HALO as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 273.3% upside for FGEN (target: $28) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78). FGEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFGEN logoFGENFibroGen, Inc.DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$28.00$46.33$78.33$45.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts14152723
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%0.0%
FGEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FGEN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGEN vs DBVT vs HALO vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 7% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -98. 5% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus FGEN's -98. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus FibroGen, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning FGEN is approximately 184% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for DBV Technologies S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus -36. 7% for FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FibroGen, Inc. grew EPS 83. 6% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HALO leads at 28. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT?

Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -160. 6% for FibroGen, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -507. 8% for FGEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HALO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FGEN: 273.

3% to $28. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT?

In this comparison, FGEN (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT, HALO, IMVT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is FGEN or DBVT or HALO or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). FibroGen, Inc. (FGEN) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, FGEN: -98. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between FGEN and DBVT and HALO and IMVT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FGEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.