Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FGI vs LESL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
FGI vs LESL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $73M | $14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $1.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-275M |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | -0.2% |
| Total Debt | $28M | $1.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $64M |
FGI vs LESL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGI vs LESL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.08
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -274.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- -61.0% 10Y total return vs LESL's -99.6%
In this particular matchup, LESL is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.9% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.08 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +198.0% vs LESL's -88.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.4% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC -3.8% vs 1.6% |
FGI vs LESL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGI vs LESL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LESL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LESL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 8.9x FGI's $136M. FGI is the more profitable business, keeping -2.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, FGI holds the edge at -0.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $183,538 | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$275M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +34.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -16.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | -85.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LESL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LESL's 20.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FGI's 89.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $14M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $962M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.46x | -0.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 89.01x | 20.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 0.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.37x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FGI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LESL scores 4/9 vs FGI's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | -42.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $948M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.14x | -3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FGI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FGI five years ago would be worth $3,897 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, FGI leads with a +198.0% total return vs LESL's -88.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FGI at -4.2% vs LESL's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.1% | -12.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +198.0% | -88.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | -99.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | -99.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.2% | -80.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FGI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FGI is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FGI currently trades 60.2% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 8.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.62 | $18.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.48 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +8.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 132K |
Analyst Outlook
LESL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LESL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FGI leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
FGI vs LESL: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGI or LESL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FGI or LESL?
Over the past 5 years, FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) delivered a total return of -61. 0%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FGI returned -61. 0% versus LESL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FGI or LESL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 103% more volatile than FGI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FGI or LESL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FGI Industries Ltd. grew EPS -274. 0% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LESL leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FGI or LESL?
FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 9% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LESL leads at 1. 1% versus -1. 6% for FGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LESL leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FGI or LESL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FGI or LESL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 08)). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FGI: -61. 0%, LESL: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FGI and LESL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.