Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Insurance - Life
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Insurance - Life |
| Market Cap | $32M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $3.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $72M | $71M | $5.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $530M |
| Gross Margin | 6.9% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 21.0% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -121.4% | -405.7% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $8.76B | $32M | $2.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $1.49B |
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founder Group Limit… (FGL) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 180.1 | +80.1% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 315.2 | +215.2% |
| F&G Annuities & Lif… (FG) | 100 | 71.4 | -28.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SPIR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs FG's 78.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.82, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 16.35x
- Beta 2.82, current ratio 16.35x
FG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 3.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 9.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 1.02 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs FGL's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.02 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs FGL's -98.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.5% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC 5.0% vs -0.1% |
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FG leads in 4 of 6 categories
ASTS leads 1 • FGL leads 0 • SPIR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FG is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 82.6x ASTS's $71M. FG is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $72M | $71M | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$74M | -$237M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25.0B | -$342M | $530M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +21.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -121.4% | -4.1% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.2% | -227.0% | -16.0% | +82.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.9% | +27.3% | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.5% | -55.6% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FG leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 31% valuation discount to FG's 14.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $3.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $38M | $513.8B | $16.8B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -111.24x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 14.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 6.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 4.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.31x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 0.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FG delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. ASTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FGL's 2.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs FGL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.3% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.2% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.5% | -0.1% | -47.1% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.7% | -0.1% | -10.0% | +0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.09x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | $751M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $8.8B | $32M | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.71x | 9.20x | -21.20x | 2.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $60 for FGL. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs FGL's -98.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs FGL's -81.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -88.4% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.5% | +73.1% | +158.1% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +77.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -79.6% | +688.2% | +78.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -78.8% | +568.8% | +78.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -81.8% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +21.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FG is the less volatile stock with a 1.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FG currently trades 73.8% from its 52-week high vs FGL's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.79x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $143.00 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $36.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $20.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.3% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 135K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 591K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", FG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). FG is the only dividend payer here at 3.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
FG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ASTS leads in 1 (Total Returns).
FGL vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Founder Group Limited Ordinary Shares (FGL). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Founder Group Limited Ordinary Shares (FGL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus FGL's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 187% more volatile than FG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Founder Group Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -39. 0% for Founder Group Limited Ordinary Shares (FGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -114. 5% for Founder Group Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FG leads at 5. 6% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ASTS leads at 53. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASTS: 58.
6% to $103. 65.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG?
In this comparison, FG (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FGL, SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGL or SPIR or ASTS or FG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
(FG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 3. 8% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FG: +78. 6%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGL and SPIR and ASTS and FG?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGL (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and FG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FG is a small-cap deep-value stock. FG pays a dividend while FGL, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.