FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
Consulting Services
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.—
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisFGO
CAT
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FGO vs CAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
Agricultural - Machinery
Market Cap$426.04B
5Y Perf.+30.7%
FGO vs CAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  FGO |  CAT |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | — | $426.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $70.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $9.42B |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $43.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $9.98B |
Quick Verdict: FGO vs CAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FGO leads in 4 of 5 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Caterpillar Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇FGO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play
FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
- Low D/E 53.8%, current ratio 1.88x
- current ratio 1.88x
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Income Pick
CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 0.6% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  FGO | 40.0% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3% |
| Quality / Margins | FGO | 33.2% margin vs CAT's 13.3% |
| Stability / Safety | FGO | Lower D/E ratio (53.8% vs 203.3%) |
| Dividends |  CAT | 0.6% yield; 32-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FGO | 34.4% ROA vs CAT's 10.0%, ROIC 95.7% vs 15.9% |
FGO vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FGO vs CAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGCAT
CATCaterpillar Inc.
0leads
FGOFG Holdings Limited C…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CATMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FGO4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FGO2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FGO8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
—
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
—
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FGO leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 3328.5x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAT's 13.3%.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $70.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +30.2% |
FGO leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $426.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $459.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 48.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 20.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 41.47x |
FGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $48 for CAT. FGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FGO scores 6/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | +47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $43.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.22x |
FGO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +53.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +157.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +297.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +292.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +1128.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +58.4% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $946.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $353.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 2.3M |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CAT is the only dividend payer here at 0.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | CATCaterpillar Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $882.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +1.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FGO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FGO vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or CAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) offers the better valuation at 48. 6x trailing P/E (37. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — FGO or CAT?
On balance sheet safety, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc.
— giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
03Which is growing faster — FGO or CAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 15. 8% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — FGO or CAT?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus 13. 1% for Caterpillar Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — FGO or CAT?
In this comparison, CAT (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is FGO or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +1129% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between FGO and CAT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CAT pays a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.