Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FGO logo
FGO
CAT logo
CAT
KO logo
KO
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap
5Y Perf.
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.

Agricultural - Machinery

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$426.04B
5Y Perf.+623.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.35B
5Y Perf.+78.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+230.8%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$404.74B
5Y Perf.+125.8%

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGO logoFGO
CAT logoCAT
KO logoKO
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
IndustryConsulting ServicesAgricultural - MachineryBeverages - Non-AlcoholicBanks - DiversifiedBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$426.04B$342.35B$869.15B$404.74B
Revenue (TTM)$21M$70.75B$49.28B$280.33B$191.57B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$9.42B$13.70B$57.05B$30.51B
Gross Margin78.5%32.5%61.7%60.0%56.1%
Operating Margin37.6%16.6%29.3%25.9%19.7%
Forward P/E37.1x24.3x14.0x12.0x
Total Debt$8M$43.33B$45.49B$942.38B$365.90B
Cash & Equiv.$16M$9.98B$10.27B$343.34B$231.84B

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGO
CAT
KO
JPM
BAC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)100723.8+623.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100178.0+78.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100330.8+230.8%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100225.8+125.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Bank of America Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CAT and KO also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FGO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play

FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
  • 40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
  • 33.2% margin vs CAT's 13.3%
  • 34.4% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 95.7% vs 3.5%
Best for: growth exposure
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 11.3% 10Y total return vs JPM's 433.9%
  • +157.4% vs KO's +13.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Income Pick

KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.15, yield 2.6%
  • 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
Best for: bank quality
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.89, current ratio 0.42x
  • PEG 0.78 vs KO's 2.18
  • Beta 0.89, yield 2.4%, current ratio 0.42x
  • Lower P/E (12.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.78 vs 2.18
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFGO logoFGO40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
ValueBAC logoBACLower P/E (12.0x vs 24.3x), PEG 0.78 vs 2.18
Quality / MarginsFGO logoFGO33.2% margin vs CAT's 13.3%
Stability / SafetyBAC logoBACBeta 0.89 vs CAT's 1.58, lower leverage
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CAT logoCAT+157.4% vs KO's +13.7%
Efficiency (ROA)FGO logoFGO34.4% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 95.7% vs 3.5%

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Autonomous Vehicle Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FGOFG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

CATCaterpillar Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Subsegments
66.6%$74.0B
Construction Industries
22.6%$25.1B
Resource Industries
11.2%$12.5B
Financial Products
3.8%$4.2B
Other Segments
0.3%$327M
Power & Energy
-4.6%$-5,058,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAT's 13.3%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$70.8B$49.3B$280.3B$191.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14.0B$15.5B$81.4B$40.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9.4B$13.7B$57.0B$30.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$11.4B$12.6B$100.9B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.5%+32.5%+61.7%+60.0%+56.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.6%+16.6%+29.3%+25.9%+19.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.2%+13.3%+27.8%+20.4%+15.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+16.2%+25.5%+36.0%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.2%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.2%+18.2%+16.0%+18.3%
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 71% valuation discount to CAT's 48.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Market CapShares × price$426.0B$342.4B$869.1B$404.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$459.4B$377.6B$1.47T$538.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.00x48.63x26.16x15.52x14.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.37.15x24.33x13.97x12.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.73x2.34x1.19x0.91x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple34.10x25.49x18.03x13.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.30x7.14x3.11x2.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x20.14x10.01x2.40x1.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF41.47x64.64x8.62x32.09x
BAC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $10 for BAC. FGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+65.5%+47.5%+41.1%+15.9%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+34.4%+10.0%+13.1%+1.3%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+95.7%+15.9%+15.8%+4.5%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+73.8%+19.1%+17.3%+8.9%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965757
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x2.03x1.33x2.60x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M$33.4B$35.2B$599.0B$134.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$10.0B$10.3B$343.3B$231.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$43.3B$45.5B$942.4B$365.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.22x10.70x0.74x0.48x
FGO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $39,214 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,636 for BAC. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +157.4% total return vs KO's +13.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 58.4% vs KO's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+53.5%+15.8%-3.5%-3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+157.4%+13.7%+18.8%+22.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+297.7%+41.5%+131.9%+94.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+292.1%+59.8%+102.6%+36.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1128.6%+112.2%+433.9%+324.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+58.4%+12.3%+32.4%+24.8%
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CAT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x-0.15x0.95x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.00$946.83$82.66$337.25$57.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$353.93$65.35$262.71$43.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.7%+96.2%+92.2%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.051.459.662.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded02.3M12.5M7.1M32.3M
Evenly matched — CAT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CAT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.0% upside for BAC (target: $61) vs -3.7% for CAT (target: $882). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CAT's 0.64%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…CAT logoCATCaterpillar Inc.KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$882.20$86.29$338.78$61.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts53486154
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+2.6%+1.9%+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises32561512
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.86$2.04$5.95$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%+0.2%+4.0%+5.3%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BAC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGO vs CAT vs KO vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +292. 1%, compared to +36. 4% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1129% versus KO's +112. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning CAT is approximately -1171% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.

0% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

2% net margin versus 13. 1% for Caterpillar Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 37. 1x for Caterpillar Inc. — 25. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BAC: 14. 0% to $61. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield), BAC (2. 4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CAT (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FGO or CAT or KO or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FGO and CAT and KO and JPM and BAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and CAT (Industrials) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. CAT, KO, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.