Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FGO logo
FGO
ITIC logo
ITIC
JPM logo
JPM
ICE logo
ICE
BAC logo
BAC
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap
5Y Perf.
ITIC
Investors Title Company

Insurance - Specialty

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$459M
5Y Perf.+100.6%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+230.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$78.76B
5Y Perf.+51.8%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$404.74B
5Y Perf.+125.8%

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGO logoFGO
ITIC logoITIC
JPM logoJPM
ICE logoICE
BAC logoBAC
IndustryConsulting ServicesInsurance - SpecialtyBanks - DiversifiedFinancial - Data & Stock ExchangesBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$459M$869.15B$78.76B$404.74B
Revenue (TTM)$21M$280M$280.33B$12.64B$191.57B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$38M$57.05B$3.30B$30.51B
Gross Margin78.5%99.0%60.0%61.9%56.1%
Operating Margin37.6%17.2%25.9%38.7%19.7%
Forward P/E40.0x14.0x17.2x12.0x
Total Debt$8M$8M$942.38B$20.28B$365.90B
Cash & Equiv.$16M$21M$343.34B$837M$231.84B

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BACLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGO
ITIC
JPM
ICE
BAC
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Investors Title Com… (ITIC)100200.6+100.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100330.8+230.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100151.8+51.8%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100225.8+125.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Investors Title Company is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. ICE and BAC also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FGO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Leader

FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
  • 33.2% margin vs ITIC's 13.6%
  • 34.4% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 95.7% vs 3.5%
Best for: growth and quality
ITIC
Investors Title Company
The Insurance Pick

ITIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 4.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 2.93x
  • Beta 0.60, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.93x
  • 4.3% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 433.9% 10Y total return vs BAC's 324.7%
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
  • Beta 0.37 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.78 vs ICE's 1.93
  • Lower P/E (12.0x vs 17.2x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.93
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFGO logoFGO40.0% revenue growth vs BAC's -0.5%
ValueBAC logoBACLower P/E (12.0x vs 17.2x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.93
Quality / MarginsFGO logoFGO33.2% margin vs ITIC's 13.6%
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.37 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
DividendsITIC logoITIC4.3% yield, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ITIC logoITIC+29.3% vs ICE's -19.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FGO logoFGO34.4% ROA vs BAC's 0.9%, ROIC 95.7% vs 3.5%

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FGOFG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

ITICInvestors Title Company
FY 2025
Net Premiums Written
78.0%$213M
Non-Title Services
7.9%$22M
Escrow, Title-Related And Other Fees
7.1%$19M
Investment Related Revenue
5.8%$16M
Other Resources, Miscellaneous
1.2%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGBAC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ITIC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITIC's 13.6%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$280M$280.3B$12.6B$191.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$52M$81.4B$6.5B$40.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$57.0B$3.3B$30.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$27M$100.9B$4.3B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.5%+99.0%+60.0%+61.9%+56.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.6%+17.2%+25.9%+38.7%+19.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.2%+13.6%+20.4%+26.1%+15.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+9.8%+36.0%+33.9%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+91.6%+16.0%+23.1%+18.3%
ITIC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — FGO and ITIC and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.1x trailing earnings, ITIC trades at a 46% valuation discount to ICE's 24.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs ICE's 2.71x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Market CapShares × price$459M$869.1B$78.8B$404.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$447M$1.47T$98.2B$538.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.00x13.10x15.52x24.10x14.04x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.39.99x13.97x17.16x12.02x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x2.71x0.91x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.12x18.03x15.21x13.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.68x3.11x6.23x2.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x1.72x2.40x2.74x1.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.10x8.62x18.36x32.09x
Evenly matched — FGO and ITIC and BAC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $10 for BAC. ITIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+65.5%+14.0%+15.9%+11.6%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+34.4%+10.6%+1.3%+2.3%+0.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+95.7%+13.7%+4.5%+7.5%+3.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+73.8%+15.0%+8.9%+9.5%+4.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965597
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.03x2.60x0.70x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M-$13M$599.0B$19.4B$134.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$21M$343.3B$837M$231.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$8M$942.4B$20.3B$365.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.74x6.53x0.48x
FGO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,277 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, ITIC leads with a +29.3% total return vs ICE's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs ICE's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-1.1%-3.5%-12.8%-3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.3%+18.8%-19.9%+22.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+98.6%+131.9%+30.7%+94.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.1%+102.6%+32.8%+36.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+271.4%+433.9%+187.7%+324.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+25.7%+32.4%+9.3%+24.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ICE and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 93.2% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 73.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x0.95x0.37x0.89x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.00$288.98$337.25$189.35$57.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$193.03$262.71$136.67$43.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.2%+92.2%+73.4%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.359.631.662.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded026K7.1M3.2M32.3M
Evenly matched — ICE and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ITIC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.3% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, ITIC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.32% vs ICE's 1.39%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…ITIC logoITICInvestors Title C…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …ICE logoICEIntercontinental …BAC logoBACBank of America C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$338.78$196.43$61.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts613654
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.3%+1.9%+1.4%+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0151312
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$10.52$5.95$1.93$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.0%+1.8%+5.3%
Evenly matched — ITIC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ITIC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FGO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGO vs ITIC vs JPM vs ICE vs BAC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Investors Title Company (ITIC) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

On trailing P/E, Investors Title Company (ITIC) is the cheapest at 13.

1x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to +32. 8% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus ICE's +187. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 160% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Investors Title Company (ITIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.

0% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

2% net margin versus 12. 9% for Investors Title Company — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 3% for ITIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITIC leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for Investors Title Company — 28. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 41. 3% to $196. 43.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC?

In this comparison, ITIC (4.

3% yield), BAC (2. 4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), ICE (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FGO or ITIC or JPM or ICE or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 37), 1. 4% yield, +187. 7% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FGO and ITIC and JPM and ICE and BAC?

These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and ITIC (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ITIC is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. ITIC, JPM, ICE, BAC pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.