Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FHI logo
FHI
BLK logo
BLK
JPM logo
JPM
STT logo
STT
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.49B
5Y Perf.+149.2%
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$173.68B
5Y Perf.+93.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%
STT
State Street Corporation

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$48.64B
5Y Perf.+164.8%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$75.83B
5Y Perf.+46.2%

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FHI logoFHI
BLK logoBLK
JPM logoJPM
STT logoSTT
ICE logoICE
IndustryAsset ManagementAsset ManagementBanks - DiversifiedAsset ManagementFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$4.49B$173.68B$908.57B$48.64B$75.83B
Revenue (TTM)$1.86B$24.22B$280.33B$22.63B$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$399M$5.55B$57.05B$2.94B$3.30B
Gross Margin51.5%50.5%60.0%61.4%61.9%
Operating Margin27.4%29.1%25.9%16.5%38.7%
Forward P/E11.6x19.7x14.6x13.5x16.5x
Total Debt$457M$15.00B$942.38B$29.80B$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$584M$11.47B$343.34B$131.36B$837M

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FHI
BLK
JPM
STT
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Federated Hermes, I… (FHI)100249.2+149.2%
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)100193.0+93.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%
State Street Corpor… (STT)100264.8+164.8%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100146.2+46.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ICE leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Federated Hermes, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. BLK, JPM, and STT also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇ICE emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FHI
Federated Hermes, Inc.
The Banking Pick

FHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.4%
  • Rev growth 11.0%, EPS growth 58.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 36.2%, current ratio 41.26x
  • Beta 0.70, yield 2.4%, current ratio 41.26x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
BLK
BlackRock, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BLK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs STT's 3.0%
Best for: growth
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs STT's 225.7%
  • PEG 0.83 vs BLK's 9.19
  • NIM 2.2% vs FHI's 0.5%
  • Lower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
STT
State Street Corporation
The Banking Pick

STT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +72.8% vs ICE's -24.4%
Best for: momentum
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.

  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 0.38 vs BLK's 1.25
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4%
Best for: quality and stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBLK logoBLK18.7% NII/revenue growth vs STT's 3.0%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.6x vs 16.5x), PEG 0.83 vs 1.86
Quality / MarginsICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.38 vs BLK's 1.25
DividendsFHI logoFHI2.4% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs BLK's 1.9%
Momentum (1Y)STT logoSTT+72.8% vs ICE's -24.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ICE logoICEEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4%

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FHIFederated Hermes, Inc.
FY 2025
Federated Hermes Funds
84.0%$1.5B
Separate accounts
14.2%$256M
Other
1.8%$33M
BLKBlackRock, Inc.
FY 2025
Investment Advice
86.3%$19.2B
Investment Performance
6.4%$1.4B
Distribution and Shareholder Service
6.1%$1.4B
Service, Other
1.2%$277M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
STTState Street Corporation
FY 2025
Investment Servicing
80.9%$11.3B
Investment Management
18.8%$2.6B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Excluding Corporate Nonsegment
0.3%$42M
ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSTTLAGGINGJPM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 150.7x FHI's $1.9B. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STT's 13.0%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$24.2B$280.3B$22.6B$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$527M$8.1B$81.4B$4.3B$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$399M$5.6B$57.0B$2.9B$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$307M$3.6B$100.9B$2.7B$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.5%+50.5%+60.0%+61.4%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+27.4%+29.1%+25.9%+16.5%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.4%+22.9%+20.4%+13.0%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+14.8%+36.0%+12.1%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+1.6%-22.7%+16.0%+23.0%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

STT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, FHI trades at a 61% valuation discount to BLK's 29.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs BLK's 13.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$4.5B$173.7B$908.6B$48.6B$75.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.4B$177.2B$1.51T-$52.9B$95.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS11.51x29.65x16.22x17.91x23.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.56x19.74x14.60x13.54x16.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x13.81x0.92x2.17x2.61x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.82x22.99x18.52x-12.35x14.76x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.48x7.17x3.25x2.15x6.00x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.51x2.82x2.51x1.75x2.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.23x46.33x9.01x11.34x17.68x
STT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FHI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FHI delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $10 for BLK. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.5%+9.9%+15.9%+10.8%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.2%+3.6%+1.3%+0.8%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+24.1%+7.5%+4.5%+4.7%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+26.3%+4.6%+8.9%+4.5%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985579
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.36x0.24x2.60x1.07x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$127M$3.5B$599.0B-$101.6B$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$584M$11.5B$343.3B$131.4B$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$457M$15.0B$942.4B$29.8B$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense44.07x10.70x0.74x0.43x6.53x
FHI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,637 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +72.8% total return vs ICE's -24.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 34.3% vs ICE's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+14.2%-2.2%+0.8%+31.7%-15.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+43.1%+9.4%+20.9%+72.8%-24.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.2%+61.1%+138.8%+142.3%+24.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+101.8%+36.8%+135.5%+130.8%+26.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+144.4%+248.2%+481.2%+225.7%+192.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.2%+17.2%+33.7%+34.3%+7.5%
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FHI and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FHI currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.70x1.25x0.87x1.14x0.38x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.83$1219.94$338.09$174.66$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.71$917.39$269.72$96.27$132.84
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+86.1%+96.2%+96.4%+70.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.256.172.174.629.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded734K600K7.4M1.9M3.3M
Evenly matched — FHI and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FHI and BLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FHI as "Hold", BLK as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", STT as "Buy", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.9% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -4.0% for STT (target: $162). For income investors, FHI offers the higher dividend yield at 2.36% vs ICE's 1.45%.

MetricFHI logoFHIFederated Hermes,…BLK logoBLKBlackRock, Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …STT logoSTTState Street Corp…ICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$57.50$1301.63$339.75$161.50$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2133613736
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.4%+1.9%+1.8%+1.8%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises316151513
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$20.24$5.95$3.09$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.9%+1.1%+3.8%+2.7%+1.8%
Evenly matched — FHI and BLK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

STT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). ICE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallState Street Corporation (STT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FHI vs BLK vs JPM vs STT vs ICE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for State Street Corporation (STT). Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc.

(FHI) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 29. 6x. On forward P/E, Federated Hermes, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +26. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus FHI's +144. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 25β — meaning BLK is approximately 232% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 3. 0% for State Street Corporation (STT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federated Hermes, Inc. grew EPS 58. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 13. 0% for State Street Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 16. 5% for STT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHI leads at 73. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 7x for BlackRock, Inc. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 44. 9% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Federated Hermes, Inc. (FHI) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 1. 4% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).

09

Is FHI or BLK or JPM or STT or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38), 1. 4% yield, +192. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +192. 5%, BLK: +248. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FHI and BLK and JPM and STT and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FHI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.