Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIGR vs LDI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
FIGR vs LDI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $7.98B | $472M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $17M | $-78M |
| Gross Margin | 92.3% | 88.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 40.5x | 13.1x |
| Total Debt | $689M | $5.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $287M | $337M |
Quick Verdict: FIGR vs LDI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 67.4%, EPS growth 135.9%
- 20.6% 10Y total return vs LDI's -89.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.89, current ratio 1.37x
LDI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.11, yield 0.8%
- Beta 2.11, yield 0.8%, current ratio 0.12x
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 40.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.4% NII/revenue growth vs LDI's 37.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 40.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.8% vs FIGR's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.11 vs FIGR's 2.89 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LDI's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.8% vs FIGR's +20.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.8% vs FIGR's 0.9% |
FIGR vs LDI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FIGR and LDI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LDI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.5x FIGR's $279M. FIGR is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LDI's -4.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$78M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$725M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.3% | +88.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | -4.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -54.7% | -47.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -45.5% |
Valuation Metrics
LDI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LDI's 22.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIGR's 318.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.0B | $472M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.4B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 454.12x | -4.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.47x | 13.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 318.11x | 22.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 28.57x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.69x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIGR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIGR delivers a 5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-20 for LDI. FIGR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.89x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LDI's 13.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIGR scores 6/9 vs LDI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | -19.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 13.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $401M | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $287M | $337M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $689M | $5.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.16x | 0.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIGR five years ago would be worth $12,057 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for LDI. Over the past 12 months, LDI leads with a +24.8% total return vs FIGR's +20.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIGR at 6.4% vs LDI's -6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.2% | -32.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +24.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -88.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.6% | -89.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | -6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIGR and LDI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LDI is the less volatile stock with a 2.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIGR's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIGR currently trades 48.1% from its 52-week high vs LDI's 27.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.89x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.00 | $5.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.01 | $1.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.1% | +27.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIGR and LDI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIGR as "Buy" and LDI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 67.3% upside for FIGR (target: $63) vs 47.5% for LDI (target: $2). LDI is the only dividend payer here at 0.83% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.75 | $2.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.0% |
FIGR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LDI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
FIGR vs LDI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIGR or LDI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is the stronger pick with 67. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 37. 6% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) offers the better valuation at 454. 1x trailing P/E (40. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIGR or LDI?
On forward P/E, loanDepot, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIGR or LDI?
Over the past 5 years, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FIGR) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -88. 4% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIGR returned +20. 6% versus LDI's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIGR or LDI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), loanDepot, Inc.
(LDI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 11β versus Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2. 89β — meaning FIGR is approximately 37% more volatile than LDI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 189% versus 13% for loanDepot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIGR or LDI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is pulling ahead at 67. 4% versus 37. 6% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to 43. 4% for loanDepot, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIGR or LDI?
Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.
Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 2% net margin versus -4. 1% for loanDepot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LDI leads at 13. 2% versus 3. 3% for FIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIGR leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIGR or LDI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, loanDepot, Inc.
(LDI) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock — 27. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIGR: 67. 3% to $62. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIGR or LDI?
In this comparison, LDI (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FIGR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIGR or LDI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, loanDepot, Inc.
(LDI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LDI: -89. 4%, FIGR: +20. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIGR and LDI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LDI pays a dividend while FIGR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.