FIGR vs LDI vs RKT vs UWMC

For growth investors, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is the stronger pick with 81. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) offers the better valuation at 27. 1x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the cheapest at 27.

1x versus Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock at 89. 8x. On forward P/E, UWM Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (FIGR) delivered a total return of +27. 0%, compared to -87. 4% for loanDepot, Inc. (LDI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIGR returned +27. 0% versus LDI's -90. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

39β versus Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock's 2. 86β — meaning FIGR is approximately 106% more volatile than UWMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 13% for loanDepot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is pulling ahead at 81. 5% versus 27. 4% for Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock grew EPS 965. 4% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Figure Technology Solutions, Inc.

Class A Common Stock (FIGR) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 4% net margin versus -4. 1% for loanDepot, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) trades at 8.

1x forward P/E versus 41. 9x for Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock — 33. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UWMC: 74. 8% to $5. 68.

In this comparison, UWMC (100.

0% yield), LDI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FIGR, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, UWM Holdings Corporation (UWMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (100.

0% yield). Figure Technology Solutions, Inc. Class A Common Stock (FIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 86 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UWMC: -42. 5%, FIGR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LDI, UWMC pay a dividend while FIGR, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.