Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Telecommunications Services
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Telecommunications Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $606M | $395M | $27.96B | $8.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $731M | $2.84B | $12.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-393M | $-9M | $537M | $-1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 9.1% | 37.9% | 31.0% | 35.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 5.0% | 28.2% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 42.8x | 38.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $3.93B | $694M | $3.45B | $17.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $117M | $300M | $1.00B |
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTAI Infrastructure… (FIP) | 100 | 131.7 | +31.7% |
| ATN International, … (ATNI) | 100 | 57.7 | -42.3% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 1376.9 | +1276.9% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 77.8 | -22.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 51.6% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
ATNI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.47, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.47 vs LUMN's 2.74
FTAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs FIP's 84.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 18.9% margin vs FIP's -66.1%
LUMN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.9% margin vs FIP's -66.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs FIP's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs FIP's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs FIP's -7.4%, ROIC 16.8% vs 0.9% |
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ATNI leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • FIP leads 0 • LUMN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ATNI and FTAI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 20.4x FIP's $595M. FTAI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIP's -66.1%. On growth, FIP holds the edge at +95.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $731M | $2.8B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $139M | $1.0B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$393M | -$9M | $537M | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$101M | $38M | -$1.4B | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +37.9% | +31.0% | +35.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +5.0% | +28.2% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.1% | -1.3% | +18.9% | -14.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | +5.1% | -48.8% | +44.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +1.6% | +65.5% | -8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +58.0% | +48.3% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ATNI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ATNI's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FTAI's 31.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $606M | $395M | $28.0B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $972M | $31.1B | $25.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.27x | -26.23x | 59.25x | -4.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 42.82x | 38.54x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.45x | 5.35x | 31.24x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 0.54x | 11.15x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 0.61x | 84.69x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.00x | — | 23.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. ATNI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATNI scores 5/9 vs FIP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | -1.5% | +181.4% | -79.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | -0.6% | +12.4% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +2.6% | +16.8% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +3.0% | +20.1% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.16x | 1.08x | 10.32x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $577M | $3.1B | $16.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $117M | $300M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $694M | $3.4B | $17.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.08x | 0.91x | 3.46x | -1.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,348 for ATNI. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs FIP's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs ATNI's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.7% | +16.9% | +29.8% | +10.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +65.0% | +149.0% | +100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | -21.0% | +905.4% | +267.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | -36.5% | +1046.8% | -28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | -53.5% | +3325.4% | -35.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | -7.6% | +115.8% | +54.4% |
Risk & Volatility
ATNI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ATNI is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATNI currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs FIP's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 0.48x | 2.01x | 2.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.94 | $30.45 | $323.51 | $11.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.90 | $13.76 | $105.59 | $3.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +84.4% | +84.2% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 48.5 | 63.7 | 73.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 80K | 1.7M | 12.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ATNI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIP as "Buy", ATNI as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 127.5% upside for FIP (target: $12) vs -14.4% for ATNI (target: $22). For income investors, ATNI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs FTAI's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.67 | $22.00 | $314.83 | $7.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 | 18 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +4.0% | +0.5% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $1.03 | $1.23 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +73.8% | +0.2% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
ATNI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FIP vs ATNI vs FTAI vs LUMN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) offers the better valuation at 59. 2x trailing P/E (38. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
On forward P/E, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 38. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -36. 5% for ATN International, Inc. (ATNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 0% versus ATNI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 83β — meaning LUMN is approximately 491% more volatile than ATNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ATN International, Inc. (ATNI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus -21. 3% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTAI leads at 30. 7% versus -1. 5% for LUMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LUMN leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) trades at 38. 5x forward P/E versus 42. 8x for ATN International, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIP: 127. 5% to $11. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN?
In this comparison, ATNI (4.
0% yield), FIP (2. 3% yield), FTAI (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. LUMN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIP or ATNI or FTAI or LUMN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ATN International, Inc.
(ATNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 4. 0% yield). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ATNI: -52. 4%, LUMN: -35. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIP and ATNI and FTAI and LUMN?
These companies operate in different sectors (FIP (Industrials) and ATNI (Communication Services) and FTAI (Industrials) and LUMN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FIP is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATNI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FIP, ATNI pay a dividend while FTAI, LUMN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.