Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $35.29B | $908.57B | $90.47B | $62.11B | $91.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.87B | $280.33B | $42.86B | $30.44B | $33.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.52B | $57.05B | $7.58B | $5.31B | $6.94B |
| Gross Margin | 65.3% | 60.0% | 62.8% | 62.2% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.9% | 25.9% | 22.2% | 20.9% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 14.6x | 11.4x | 10.6x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $14.52B | $942.38B | $77.93B | $69.80B | $57.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.50B | $343.34B | $46.89B | $36.38B | $39.71B |
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) | 100 | 273.5 | +173.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| U.S. Bancorp (USB) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Truist Financial Co… (TFC) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| The PNC Financial S… (PNC) | 100 | 220.5 | +120.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FITB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 2.8% vs JPM's 2.2%
- +40.0% vs JPM's +20.9%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs FITB's 245.9%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNC's 0.4%
USB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 3.5%
TFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 25.5%, EPS growth 13.7%
- Beta 0.82, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.87x
- 25.5% NII/revenue growth vs PNC's -7.0%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 11.4x)
PNC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 94.2%, current ratio 0.11x
- PEG 0.59 vs TFC's 2.42
- Beta 0.68 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.5% NII/revenue growth vs PNC's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs JPM's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, vs USB's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.0% vs JPM's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PNC's 0.4% |
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TFC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FITB leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • USB leads 0 • PNC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — JPM and PNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 21.8x FITB's $12.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.4% (PNC) to 17.4% (TFC).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.9B | $280.3B | $42.9B | $30.4B | $34.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.6B | $81.4B | $10.3B | $7.1B | $8.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $57.0B | $7.6B | $5.3B | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.3B | $100.9B | $8.0B | $5.7B | $5.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.3% | +60.0% | +62.8% | +62.2% | +65.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.9% | +25.9% | +22.2% | +20.9% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +20.4% | +17.7% | +17.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +36.0% | +18.6% | +18.9% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +16.0% | +24.8% | -9.1% | +24.6% |
Valuation Metrics
TFC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.6x trailing earnings, USB trades at a 22% valuation discount to JPM's 16.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PNC offers better value at 0.66x vs TFC's 2.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35.3B | $908.6B | $90.5B | $62.1B | $91.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46.3B | $1.51T | $121.5B | $95.5B | $108.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.90x | 16.22x | 12.61x | 12.65x | 13.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.22x | 14.60x | 11.40x | 10.64x | 12.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.06x | 0.92x | 1.48x | 2.88x | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.81x | 18.52x | 11.81x | 13.54x | 12.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 3.25x | 2.11x | 2.04x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.62x | 2.51x | 1.38x | 0.95x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.27x | 9.01x | 11.35x | 10.82x | 9.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FITB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $8 for TFC. FITB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FITB scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +15.9% | +12.0% | +8.2% | +11.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.3% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +4.5% | +5.2% | +3.6% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +8.9% | +6.4% | +5.5% | +6.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 2.60x | 1.19x | 1.07x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.0B | $599.0B | $31.0B | $33.4B | $17.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $343.3B | $46.9B | $36.4B | $39.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $942.4B | $77.9B | $69.8B | $57.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 0.74x | 0.66x | 0.63x | 0.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,091 for TFC. Over the past 12 months, FITB leads with a +40.0% total return vs JPM's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs TFC's 20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.4% | +0.8% | +8.8% | -0.7% | +11.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.0% | +20.9% | +39.1% | +26.6% | +36.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.1% | +138.8% | +91.0% | +74.1% | +98.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +135.5% | +23.9% | +10.9% | +47.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +245.9% | +481.2% | +81.5% | +85.7% | +234.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.9% | +33.7% | +24.1% | +20.3% | +25.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TFC's 86.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.87x | 0.78x | 0.82x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.44 | $338.09 | $61.19 | $56.20 | $243.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.10 | $269.72 | $42.55 | $38.94 | $172.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +96.2% | +95.0% | +86.0% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 72.1 | 59.1 | 46.8 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.2M | 7.4M | 7.8M | 7.8M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FITB and JPM and USB and TFC and PNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FITB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", USB as "Hold", TFC as "Buy", PNC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.8% upside for TFC (target: $56) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, TFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs JPM's 1.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.50 | $339.75 | $63.82 | $56.44 | $252.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 61 | 49 | 54 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +1.8% | +3.5% | +4.3% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.74 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $2.08 | $6.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +3.8% | +0.5% | +4.0% | +1.5% |
TFC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FITB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FITB vs JPM vs USB vs TFC vs PNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) is the stronger pick with 25.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). U. S. Bancorp (USB) offers the better valuation at 12. 6x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
On trailing P/E, U.
S. Bancorp (USB) is the cheapest at 12. 6x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. at 16. 2x. On forward P/E, Truist Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. wins at 0. 59x versus Truist Financial Corporation's 2. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to +10. 9% for Truist Financial Corporation (TFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus USB's +81. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 87β — meaning JPM is approximately 28% more volatile than PNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) is pulling ahead at 25.
5% versus -7. 0% for The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: U. S. Bancorp grew EPS 21. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for JPMorgan Chase & Co.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus 17. 4% for Truist Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PNC leads at 27. 1% versus 20. 9% for TFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PNC leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Truist Financial Corporation's 2. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for Fifth Third Bancorp — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TFC: 16. 8% to $56. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 1. 8% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).
09Is FITB or JPM or USB or TFC or PNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
(PNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 9% yield, +234. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PNC: +234. 3%, TFC: +85. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FITB and JPM and USB and TFC and PNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FITB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; USB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TFC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PNC is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.