Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FKWL
Franklin Wireless Corp.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$41M
5Y Perf.-39.3%
INSG
Inseego Corp.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$306M
5Y Perf.-82.2%
SMSI
Smith Micro Software, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-97.5%
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$708M
5Y Perf.+0.6%
CALX
Calix, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.81B
5Y Perf.+208.7%

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FKWL logoFKWL
INSG logoINSG
SMSI logoSMSI
NTGR logoNTGR
CALX logoCALX
IndustryCommunication EquipmentCommunication EquipmentSoftware - ApplicationCommunication EquipmentSoftware - Application
Market Cap$41M$306M$17M$708M$2.81B
Revenue (TTM)$40M$169M$17M$690M$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$187K$13M$-28M$-40M$34M
Gross Margin19.0%38.1%75.5%37.5%57.1%
Operating Margin-6.7%0.9%-154.8%-4.4%3.8%
Forward P/E56.6x129.4x24.5x
Total Debt$1M$48M$2M$51M$26M
Cash & Equiv.$15M$25M$1M$210M$143M

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FKWL
INSG
SMSI
NTGR
CALX
StockMay 20May 26Return
Franklin Wireless C… (FKWL)10060.7-39.3%
Inseego Corp. (INSG)10017.8-82.2%
Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI)1002.5-97.5%
NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR)100100.6+0.6%
Calix, Inc. (CALX)100308.7+208.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INSG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Franklin Wireless Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. SMSI and CALX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FKWL
Franklin Wireless Corp.
The Growth Play

FKWL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 93.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
  • Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.64x
  • 49.6% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5%
  • Beta 0.01 vs INSG's 2.39
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
INSG
Inseego Corp.
The Quality Compounder

INSG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.

  • 7.7% margin vs SMSI's -165.4%
  • +130.5% vs FKWL's -24.2%
  • 15.0% ROA vs SMSI's -104.4%, ROIC 25.4% vs -48.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
SMSI
Smith Micro Software, Inc.
The Income Pick

SMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 4.4%
  • 4.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, NTGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
CALX
Calix, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.1% 10Y total return vs FKWL's 38.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
  • Lower P/E (24.5x vs 129.4x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFKWL logoFKWL49.6% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5%
ValueCALX logoCALXLower P/E (24.5x vs 129.4x)
Quality / MarginsINSG logoINSG7.7% margin vs SMSI's -165.4%
Stability / SafetyFKWL logoFKWLBeta 0.01 vs INSG's 2.39
DividendsSMSI logoSMSI4.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)INSG logoINSG+130.5% vs FKWL's -24.2%
Efficiency (ROA)INSG logoINSG15.0% ROA vs SMSI's -104.4%, ROIC 25.4% vs -48.3%

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FKWLFranklin Wireless Corp.
FY 2025
Operating Segments
100.0%$46M
INSGInseego Corp.
FY 2025
Product
50.3%$118M
Mobile Solutions
29.0%$68M
Software Services and Other
20.7%$49M
SMSISmith Micro Software, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
100.0%$3M
NTGRNETGEAR, Inc.
FY 2025
Consumer
51.1%$358M
Enterprise
48.9%$342M
CALXCalix, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.0B

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFKWLLAGGINGNTGR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CALX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CALX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 62.5x SMSI's $17M. INSG is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMSI's -165.4%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$169M$17M$690M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M$10M-$21M-$19M$57M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$187,072$13M-$28M-$40M$34M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$9M$12M-$10M-$11M$109M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.0%+38.1%+75.5%+37.5%+57.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-6.7%+0.9%-154.8%-4.4%+3.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.5%+7.7%-165.4%-5.8%+3.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-23.9%+6.9%-61.3%-1.6%+10.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.1%+8.4%-8.7%-2.0%+27.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+134.2%+5.1%+64.3%-123.8%+3.3%
CALX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FKWL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, INSG's 25.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$41M$306M$17M$708M$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$27M$330M$18M$549M$2.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-167.96x-104.87x-0.58x-22.71x167.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.56.63x129.45x24.49x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.09x69.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.88x1.84x1.00x1.02x2.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.08x0.94x1.50x3.57x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.51x46.88x24.34x
FKWL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INSG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CALX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-142 for SMSI. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMSI's 0.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FKWL scores 7/9 vs SMSI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.5%-141.9%-8.0%+4.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%+15.0%-104.4%-4.9%+3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-8.6%+25.4%-48.3%-8.4%+2.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-7.5%+11.5%-62.8%-6.0%+2.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976356
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.04x0.13x0.10x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$13M$24M$844,000-$159M-$118M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$25M$1M$210M$143M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$48M$2M$51M$26M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.07x-7.39x
INSG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — INSG and NTGR and CALX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CALX five years ago would be worth $9,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $207 for SMSI. Over the past 12 months, INSG leads with a +130.5% total return vs FKWL's -24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTGR at 23.1% vs SMSI's -56.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.9%+86.7%+53.2%+6.5%-18.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.2%+130.5%-19.8%-9.7%+3.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.1%+60.0%-91.9%+86.5%+2.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.5%-77.3%-97.9%-33.0%-9.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+38.9%+27.5%-96.5%-37.7%+513.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.4%+17.0%-56.7%+23.1%+0.7%
Evenly matched — INSG and NTGR and CALX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FKWL and INSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FKWL is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSG's 2.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSG currently trades 86.6% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.01x2.39x1.48x1.39x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.48$21.80$1.30$36.86$71.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.44$6.27$0.43$19.00$40.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+63.1%+86.6%+64.8%+70.2%+61.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.468.066.756.143.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7K164K310K515K918K
Evenly matched — FKWL and INSG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: INSG as "Buy", NTGR as "Hold", CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs 16.6% for INSG (target: $22). SMSI is the only dividend payer here at 4.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFKWL logoFKWLFranklin Wireless…INSG logoINSGInseego Corp.SMSI logoSMSISmith Micro Softw…NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.00$36.00$61.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts101721
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises11
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%0.0%0.0%+7.2%+3.3%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

CALX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FKWL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallFranklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FKWL vs INSG vs SMSI vs NTGR vs CALX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Franklin Wireless Corp.

(FKWL) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Calix, Inc. (CALX) offers the better valuation at 167. 4x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inseego Corp. (INSG) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

On forward P/E, Calix, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 24. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

Over the past 5 years, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) delivered a total return of -9. 3%, compared to -97. 9% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +513. 0% versus SMSI's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Wireless Corp.

(FKWL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Inseego Corp. 's 2. 39β — meaning INSG is approximately 27649% more volatile than FKWL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Wireless Corp.

(FKWL) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FKWL leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

Calix, Inc.

(CALX) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 8% net margin versus -173. 3% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSG leads at 2. 8% versus -110. 8% for SMSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.

(CALX) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 105. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX?

In this comparison, SMSI (4.

4% yield) pays a dividend. FKWL, INSG, NTGR, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FKWL or INSG or SMSI or NTGR or CALX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Wireless Corp.

(FKWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01)). Inseego Corp. (INSG) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FKWL: +38. 9%, INSG: +27. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FKWL and INSG and SMSI and NTGR and CALX?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FKWL is a small-cap high-growth stock; INSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock. SMSI pays a dividend while FKWL, INSG, NTGR, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FKWL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SMSI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 45%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTGR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CALX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FKWL and INSG and SMSI and NTGR and CALX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FKWL: -33.1% · INSG: 8.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.