FKWL
Franklin Wireless Corp.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$41M
5Y Perf.-39.6%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.
Communication Equipment
Market Cap$708M
5Y Perf.+6.8%
CALX
Calix, Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$2.81B
5Y Perf.+206.7%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
Semiconductors
Market Cap$213.51B
5Y Perf.+170.9%
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FKWL | NTGR | CALX | QCOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $41M | $708M | $2.81B | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $690M | $1.06B | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $187K | $-40M | $34M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 19.0% | 37.5% | 57.1% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -6.7% | -4.4% | 3.8% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 137.3x | 24.3x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $51M | $26M | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $210M | $143M | $7.84B |
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FKWL
NTGR
CALX
QCOM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Franklin Wireless C… (FKWL) | 100 | 60.4 | -39.6% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 106.8 | +6.8% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 306.7 | +206.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 270.9 | +170.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: QCOM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Franklin Wireless Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FKWL
Franklin Wireless Corp.
The Growth Play
FKWL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 93.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 3.7%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.01, current ratio 3.64x
- 49.6% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
NTGR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
CALX
Calix, Inc.
The Income Pick
CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs QCOM's 350.2%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Value Play
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 24.3x)
- 22.3% margin vs NTGR's -5.8%
- 1.7% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +42.9% vs FKWL's -24.2%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FKWL | 49.6% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9% |
| Value | QCOM | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 24.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | QCOM | 22.3% margin vs NTGR's -5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | FKWL | Beta 0.01 vs QCOM's 1.55, lower leverage |
| Dividends | QCOM | 1.7% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | QCOM | +42.9% vs FKWL's -24.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | QCOM | 18.4% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 29.1% vs -8.4% |
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLQCOMLAGGINGCALX
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
FKWL leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • CALX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓CALXCalix, Inc.
0leads
NTGRNETGEAR, Inc.
0leads
FKWLFranklin Wireless Cor…
0leads
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FKWLvs NTGRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
QCOM4/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
QCOM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
QCOM1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CALX and QCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 1123.1x FKWL's $40M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTGR's -5.8%. On growth, CALX holds the edge at +27.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $690M | $1.1B | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$19M | $57M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $187,072 | -$40M | $34M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$11M | $109M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +37.5% | +57.1% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | -4.4% | +3.8% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -5.8% | +3.2% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.9% | -1.6% | +10.3% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.1% | -2.0% | +27.1% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +134.2% | -123.8% | +3.3% | +173.0% |
Evenly matched — CALX and QCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FKWL and QCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 76% valuation discount to CALX's 167.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CALX's 69.6x.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $41M | $708M | $2.8B | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $549M | $2.7B | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -167.96x | -22.71x | 167.38x | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 137.35x | 24.33x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 69.62x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.88x | 1.02x | 2.81x | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | 1.50x | 3.57x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.51x | — | 24.34x | 16.65x |
Evenly matched — FKWL and QCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NTGR. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FKWL scores 7/9 vs NTGR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | -8.0% | +4.2% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -4.9% | +3.5% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.6% | -8.4% | +2.1% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.5% | -6.0% | +2.5% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.10x | 0.03x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$13M | -$159M | -$118M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $210M | $143M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $51M | $26M | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 17.60x |
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QCOM five years ago would be worth $15,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,954 for FKWL. Over the past 12 months, QCOM leads with a +42.9% total return vs FKWL's -24.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QCOM at 25.2% vs FKWL's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.9% | +6.5% | -18.8% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.2% | -9.7% | +3.3% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.1% | +86.5% | +2.1% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.5% | -33.0% | -9.3% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.9% | -37.7% | +513.0% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +23.1% | +0.7% | +25.2% |
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FKWL and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FKWL is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QCOM's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QCOM currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.43x | 0.98x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.48 | $36.86 | $71.22 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $19.00 | $40.75 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.1% | +70.2% | +61.1% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.4 | 56.1 | 43.3 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 515K | 918K | 15.1M |
Evenly matched — FKWL and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTGR as "Hold", CALX as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -8.4% for QCOM (target: $186). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.70% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FKWLFranklin Wireless… | NTGRNETGEAR, Inc. | CALXCalix, Inc. | QCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $61.00 | $185.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 21 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +7.2% | +3.3% | +4.1% |
QCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
Best OverallQUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FKWL vs NTGR vs CALX vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Franklin Wireless Corp.
(FKWL) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus Calix, Inc. at 167. 4x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) delivered a total return of +58.
5%, compared to -70. 5% for Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CALX returned +509. 0% versus NTGR's -33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Franklin Wireless Corp.
(FKWL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 1. 64β — meaning QCOM is approximately -8894% more volatile than FKWL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Franklin Wireless Corp.
(FKWL) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FKWL leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -6. 2% for FKWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20.
4x forward P/E versus 137. 3x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 117. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FKWL, NTGR, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FKWL or NTGR or CALX or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Franklin Wireless Corp.
(FKWL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FKWL: +38. 1%, NTGR: -33. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FKWL and NTGR and CALX and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FKWL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while FKWL, NTGR, CALX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FKWL: -33.1% · NTGR: -2.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.