Asset Management - Cryptocurrency
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLD vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
FLD vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management - Cryptocurrency | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $60M | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -87.2% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $95M |
FLD vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) | 100 | 11.2 | -88.8% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLD vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.55
- Lower volatility, beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- -60.4% 10Y total return vs FLD's -88.8%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FLD's 1.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -9.0% vs FLD's -69.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs FLD's 1.3% |
FLD vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLD vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 5.2x FLD's $32M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLD's -2.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$70M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.2% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -50.7% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.2% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FLD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $60M | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.75x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for FLD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs FLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -87.5% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.2% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.9% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.6% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.69x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,543 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,121 for FLD. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs FLD's -69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -7.1% vs FLD's -51.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.4% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -69.9% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.8% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.8% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs FLD's 22.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.53 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 128K | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FLD vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLD or BTBT a better buy right now?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLD or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) delivered a total return of -84. 6%, compared to -88. 8% for Fold Holdings Inc (FLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus FLD's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLD or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
55β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 118% more volatile than FLD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLD or BTBT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc.
grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1275. 0% for Fold Holdings Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLD or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -218. 9% for Fold Holdings Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -87. 2% for FLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLD or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FLD or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLD: -88. 8%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLD and BTBT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.