Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLD vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$60M
5Y Perf.-88.8%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-52.0%

FLD vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLD logoFLD
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryAsset Management - CryptocurrencyFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$60M$589M
Revenue (TTM)$32M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-70M$137M
Gross Margin44.4%61.9%
Operating Margin-87.2%16.8%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$0.00$14M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$95M

FLD vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLD
BTBT
StockJul 24May 26Return
Fold Holdings Inc (FLD)10011.2-88.8%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10048.0-52.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLD vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Fold Holdings Inc is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLD
Fold Holdings Inc
The Banking Pick

FLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 1.55
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
  • Beta 1.55, current ratio 0.86x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • -60.4% 10Y total return vs FLD's -88.8%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FLD's -61.9%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBTEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs FLD's 1.3% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFLD logoFLDBeta 1.55 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BTBT logoBTBT-9.0% vs FLD's -69.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBTEfficiency ratio 0.5% vs FLD's 1.3%

FLD vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLDFold Holdings Inc
FY 2025
Other Revenues
100.0%$63,663
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

FLD vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGFLD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 5.2x FLD's $32M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLD's -2.2%.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$32M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$27M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$70M$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-87.2%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-2.2%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-50.7%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-101.2%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$60M$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$52M$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.75x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.87x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.82x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
FLD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-88 for FLD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs FLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-87.5%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-41.2%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.9%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-31.6%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.69x
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BTBT five years ago would be worth $1,543 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,121 for FLD. Over the past 12 months, BTBT leads with a -9.0% total return vs FLD's -69.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BTBT at -7.1% vs FLD's -51.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-55.4%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-69.9%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-88.8%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-51.8%-7.1%
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLD is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BTBT currently trades 40.2% from its 52-week high vs FLD's 22.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.55x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.53$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.00$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+22.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10039.869.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded128K18.5M
Evenly matched — FLD and BTBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFLD logoFLDFold Holdings IncBTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLD vs BTBT: Frequently Asked Questions

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLD or BTBT a better buy right now?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — FLD or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) delivered a total return of -84. 6%, compared to -88. 8% for Fold Holdings Inc (FLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BTBT returned -60. 4% versus FLD's -88. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — FLD or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

55β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately 118% more volatile than FLD relative to the S&P 500.

04

Which is growing faster — FLD or BTBT?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc.

grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1275. 0% for Fold Holdings Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — FLD or BTBT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -218. 9% for Fold Holdings Inc — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -87. 2% for FLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — FLD or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. FLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is FLD or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fold Holdings Inc (FLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.

Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLD: -88. 8%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between FLD and BTBT?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.