Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLO vs CPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
FLO vs CPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $1.82B | $6.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.26B | $10.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 48.1% | 29.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $2.33B | $7.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $132M |
FLO vs CPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 41.1 | -58.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLO vs CPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 11.4%
- -13.0% 10Y total return vs CPB's -44.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.75x
CPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs FLO's 3.0%
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs FLO's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.5% margin vs FLO's 1.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (178.9% vs 184.7%) | |
| Dividends | 11.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs CPB's 7.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -36.6% vs FLO's -44.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs FLO's 2.0%, ROIC 9.1% vs 8.1% |
FLO vs CPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLO vs CPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPB is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 1.9x FLO's $5.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CPB) to 1.6% (FLO). On growth, FLO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $482M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $329M | $919M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.1% | +29.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLO and CPB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, CPB trades at a 52% valuation discount to FLO's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CPB's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLO's 8.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.1B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.55x | 10.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.37x | 9.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.08x | 7.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.35x | 0.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.70x | 8.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLO. FLO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.79x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs FLO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.79x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $7.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $7.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.52x | 3.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPB five years ago would be worth $5,717 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,355 for FLO. Over the past 12 months, CPB leads with a -36.6% total return vs FLO's -44.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CPB at -22.3% vs FLO's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.8% | -21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.8% | -36.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.7% | -53.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | -42.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.0% | -44.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -26.2% | -22.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CPB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPB is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLO's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPB currently trades 58.0% from its 52-week high vs FLO's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.68 | $36.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.86 | $19.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +48.8% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLO as "Hold" and CPB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.2% upside for CPB (target: $26) vs 16.0% for FLO (target: $10). For income investors, FLO offers the higher dividend yield at 11.45% vs CPB's 7.30%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $25.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.4% | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 19 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.99 | $1.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.0% |
CPB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FLO vs CPB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLO or CPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger pick with 6.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Campbell Soup Company (CPB) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLO or CPB?
On trailing P/E, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Flowers Foods, Inc. at 21. 6x. On forward P/E, Campbell Soup Company is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLO or CPB?
Over the past 5 years, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) delivered a total return of -42.
8%, compared to -46. 5% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLO returned -13. 0% versus CPB's -44. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLO or CPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Flowers Foods, Inc. 's 0. 32β — meaning FLO is approximately -1926% more volatile than CPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 179% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLO or CPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is pulling ahead at 6.
4% versus 3. 0% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -65. 8% for Flowers Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPB leads at 6. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLO or CPB?
Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
9% net margin versus 1. 6% for Flowers Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPB leads at 13. 2% versus 6. 6% for FLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLO leads at 45. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLO or CPB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Flowers Foods, Inc. — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPB: 23. 2% to $25. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLO or CPB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 7. 3% for Campbell Soup Company (CPB).
09Is FLO or CPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 7. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPB: -44. 5%, FLO: -13. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLO and CPB?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.