Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $9.14B | $30.35B | $15.97B | $12.76B | $13.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.65B | $7.78B | $3.53B | $4.20B | $2.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $354M | $587M | $508M | $671M | $516M |
| Gross Margin | 35.5% | 38.2% | 44.4% | 40.9% | 52.3% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 18.1% | 20.8% | 20.6% | 26.9% |
| Forward P/E | 17.5x | 22.0x | 25.5x | 14.8x | 25.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.91B | $4.78B | $1.82B | $1.64B | $61M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $760M | $1.25B | $580M | $102M | $624M |
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flowserve Corporati… (FLS) | 100 | 274.1 | +174.1% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
| IDEX Corporation (IEX) | 100 | 134.8 | +34.8% |
| Pentair plc (PNR) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| Graco Inc. (GGG) | 100 | 163.2 | +63.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.82 vs IEX's 4.77
- +55.0% vs PNR's -12.8%
IR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 299.5% 10Y total return vs GGG's 228.8%
Among these 5 stocks, IEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PNR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 25.2x), PEG 1.13 vs 2.54
GGG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 20 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 1.4%
- Rev growth 5.8%, EPS growth 9.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 2.3%, current ratio 3.15x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 3.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.8% revenue growth vs PNR's 2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 25.2x), PEG 1.13 vs 2.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.0% margin vs IR's 7.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs FLS's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 20-year raise streak, vs IEX's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.0% vs PNR's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs IR's 3.2%, ROIC 22.6% vs 7.8% |
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GGG leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLS leads 1 • IR leads 0 • IEX leads 0 • PNR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GGG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 3.5x GGG's $2.2B. GGG is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IR's 7.5%. On growth, IEX holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $7.8B | $3.5B | $4.2B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $683M | $1.9B | $945M | $983M | $690M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $354M | $587M | $508M | $671M | $516M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $437M | $1.2B | $611M | $716M | $631M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.5% | +38.2% | +44.4% | +40.9% | +52.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +18.1% | +20.8% | +20.6% | +26.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +7.5% | +14.4% | +16.0% | +23.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +14.9% | +17.3% | +17.0% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.7% | +7.6% | +8.9% | +2.6% | +2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +6.5% | +27.8% | +12.9% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLS and PNR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, PNR trades at a 63% valuation discount to IR's 53.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FLS offers better value at 1.26x vs IEX's 6.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.1B | $30.4B | $16.0B | $12.8B | $13.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.3B | $33.9B | $17.2B | $14.3B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.10x | 53.45x | 33.51x | 19.94x | 25.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.47x | 22.05x | 25.52x | 14.75x | 25.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.26x | — | 6.27x | 1.52x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.51x | 17.61x | 18.58x | 14.66x | 17.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.93x | 3.97x | 4.62x | 3.06x | 5.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.16x | 3.06x | 4.02x | 3.38x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | 24.88x | 25.89x | 17.11x | 20.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GGG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GGG delivers a 19.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for IR. GGG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLS's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PNR scores 8/9 vs GGG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.5% | +5.8% | +12.6% | +17.7% | +19.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +3.2% | +7.3% | +9.9% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +7.8% | +10.4% | +12.1% | +22.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +8.7% | +11.6% | +15.0% | +22.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.85x | 0.47x | 0.45x | 0.42x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $3.5B | $1.2B | $1.5B | -$563M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $760M | $1.2B | $580M | $102M | $624M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $4.8B | $1.8B | $1.6B | $61M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.45x | 4.53x | 11.33x | 11.94x | 209.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLS five years ago would be worth $17,735 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,068 for IEX. Over the past 12 months, FLS leads with a +55.0% total return vs PNR's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLS at 27.3% vs GGG's 1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.4% | -2.8% | +20.4% | -24.6% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.0% | -0.4% | +20.9% | -12.8% | -2.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.2% | +31.9% | +5.9% | +39.8% | +4.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.4% | +54.1% | +0.7% | +23.0% | +6.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.6% | +299.5% | +189.3% | +126.9% | +228.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.3% | +9.7% | +1.9% | +11.8% | +1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IEX and GGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GGG is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLS's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IEX currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs PNR's 69.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 1.48x | 0.95x | 1.22x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $92.41 | $100.96 | $223.84 | $113.95 | $95.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.11 | $72.45 | $157.25 | $77.02 | $77.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.4% | +76.8% | +96.0% | +69.3% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 43.3 | 67.6 | 35.3 | 40.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.1M | 3.1M | 713K | 1.6M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IEX and GGG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLS as "Hold", IR as "Buy", IEX as "Hold", PNR as "Hold", GGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.8% upside for PNR (target: $114) vs 12.7% for IEX (target: $242). For income investors, GGG offers the higher dividend yield at 1.38% vs IR's 0.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.57 | $99.50 | $242.14 | $113.56 | $95.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 15 | 29 | 41 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.1% | +1.3% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 23 | 6 | 20 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.84 | $0.08 | $2.82 | $0.99 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +3.4% | +1.6% | +1.8% | +3.2% |
GGG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
FLS vs IR vs IEX vs PNR vs GGG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the stronger pick with 5. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). Pentair plc (PNR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
On trailing P/E, Pentair plc (PNR) is the cheapest at 19.
9x versus Ingersoll Rand Inc. at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Pentair plc is actually cheaper at 14. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Flowserve Corporation wins at 0. 82x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
Over the past 5 years, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) delivered a total return of +77.
4%, compared to +0. 7% for IDEX Corporation (IEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IR returned +299. 5% versus FLS's +75. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Flowserve Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning FLS is approximately 110% more volatile than GGG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graco Inc. (GGG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 85% for Flowserve Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Graco Inc.
(GGG) is pulling ahead at 5. 8% versus 2. 3% for Pentair plc (PNR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flowserve Corporation grew EPS 23. 4% year-over-year, compared to -29. 6% for Ingersoll Rand Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLS leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 3% net margin versus 7. 3% for Flowserve Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GGG leads at 27. 3% versus 13. 0% for FLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GGG leads at 52. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Flowserve Corporation (FLS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 82x versus IDEX Corporation's 4. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pentair plc (PNR) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for IDEX Corporation — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PNR: 43. 8% to $113. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Graco Inc. (GGG) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 1% for Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR).
09Is FLS or IR or IEX or PNR or GGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graco Inc.
(GGG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), 1. 4% yield, +228. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GGG: +228. 8%, IR: +299. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLS and IR and IEX and PNR and GGG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FLS, IEX, PNR, GGG pay a dividend while IR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.