Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $17.64B | $9.75B | $35.69B | $12.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.02B | $17.72B | $13.74B | $6.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-455M | $183M | $1.84B | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 44.2% | 26.7% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | 5.2% | 24.6% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 22.1x | 16.2x | 99.1x |
| Total Debt | $13.35B | $56.16B | $16.14B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.83B | $2.06B | $3.84B | $1.60B |
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 221.8 | +121.8% |
| Las Vegas Sands Cor… (LVS) | 100 | 112.2 | +12.2% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLUT plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LVS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 2.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.09, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 99.1x)
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs MGM's 81.8%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs FLUT's -2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.7% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC 16.9% vs 4.5% |
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LVS leads in 3 of 6 categories
DKNG leads 1 • FLUT leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LVS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 2.9x DKNG's $6.1B. LVS is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLUT's -2.7%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.0B | $17.7B | $13.7B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $2.0B | $4.9B | $266M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$455M | $183M | $1.8B | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $880M | $1.7B | $2.3B | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +44.2% | +26.7% | +41.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +5.2% | +24.6% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +1.0% | +13.4% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | +9.8% | +16.9% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +4.2% | +25.3% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.3% | -5.9% | +73.5% | +192.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MGM and LVS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, LVS trades at a 54% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LVS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $9.8B | $35.7B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.2B | $63.8B | $48.0B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.47x | 50.14x | 22.89x | -3113.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.51x | 22.10x | 16.20x | 99.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.69x | 31.61x | 10.37x | 49.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 0.56x | 2.74x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 3.08x | 19.27x | 19.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.35x | 5.85x | 21.58x | 19.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LVS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LVS delivers a 95.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $96 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. FLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LVS scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | +5.3% | +95.8% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | +0.4% | +8.5% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +1.7% | +16.9% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +2.6% | +19.0% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.38x | 17.14x | 8.34x | 3.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $54.1B | $12.3B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $2.1B | $3.8B | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $56.2B | $16.1B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.04x | 1.52x | 4.25x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LVS five years ago would be worth $9,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,935 for FLUT. Over the past 12 months, LVS leads with a +38.7% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKNG at 1.4% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.7% | +4.4% | -16.6% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.3% | +20.1% | +38.7% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -12.3% | -9.0% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.7% | -4.5% | -1.9% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.9% | +81.8% | +52.5% | +157.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.1% | -4.3% | -3.1% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGM and LVS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LVS is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.28x | 1.09x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.69 | $40.94 | $70.45 | $48.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.94 | $29.19 | $38.91 | $20.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.2% | +93.1% | +76.3% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 50.0 | 45.7 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 4.4M | 3.9M | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
LVS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FLUT as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", LVS as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40). LVS is the only dividend payer here at 2.24% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $227.86 | $39.71 | $69.70 | $36.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 36 | 49 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +12.6% | +6.2% | +6.6% |
LVS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DKNG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FLUT vs MGM vs LVS vs DKNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
On trailing P/E, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the cheapest at 22. 9x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Las Vegas Sands Corp. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) delivered a total return of -1. 9%, compared to -50. 7% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +157. 3% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 17% more volatile than LVS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, LVS leads at 46. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LVS leads at 23. 7% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG?
In this comparison, LVS (2.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FLUT, MGM, DKNG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLUT or MGM or LVS or DKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Las Vegas Sands Corp.
(LVS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LVS: +52. 5%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLUT and MGM and LVS and DKNG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LVS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LVS pays a dividend while FLUT, MGM, DKNG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.