FLX
BingEx Limited
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$124M
5Y Perf.-80.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLX vs UPS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$85.05B
5Y Perf.-18.8%
FLX vs UPS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLX | UPS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $124M | $85.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.02B | $88.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-207M | $5.25B |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $32.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $592M | $5.89B |
FLX vs UPS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLX
UPS
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BingEx Limited (FLX) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLX vs UPS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UPS leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. BingEx Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLX
BingEx Limited
The Growth Play
FLX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -1.3%, EPS growth -402.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 1.87x
- -1.3% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
The Income Pick
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- 44.7% 10Y total return vs FLX's -84.8%
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLX | -1.3% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% |
| Value | FLX | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 14.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | UPS | 5.9% margin vs FLX's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | UPS | Beta 0.90 vs FLX's 1.48 |
| Dividends | UPS | 6.3% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FLX | +13.8% vs UPS's +13.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UPS | 7.3% ROA vs FLX's -16.9%, ROIC 16.1% vs -9.8% |
FLX vs UPS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FLX vs UPS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUPSLAGGINGFLX
FLXBingEx Limited
1leads
UPSUnited Parcel Service…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
UPS5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLX4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UPS4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UPS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
UPS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPS is the larger business by revenue, generating $88.3B annually — 22.0x FLX's $4.0B. UPS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLX's -5.2%. On growth, UPS holds the edge at -1.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $88.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$207M | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $4.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -27.1% |
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $85.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $111.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.47x | 15.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.95x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 5.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 808.01x | 17.85x |
FLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-26 for FLX. FLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.3% | +33.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.9% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.8% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$550M | $26.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $592M | $5.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $32.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.37x |
UPS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UPS five years ago would be worth $5,997 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,516 for FLX. Over the past 12 months, FLX leads with a +13.8% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UPS at -11.8% vs FLX's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.2% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.8% | +13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | -40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | +44.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | -11.8% |
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLX's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UPS currently trades 81.8% from its 52-week high vs FLX's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.45 | $122.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.08 | $82.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +81.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 44.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 192K | 5.8M |
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
UPS is the only dividend payer here at 6.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | UPSUnited Parcel Ser… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
UPS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallUnited Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLX vs UPS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLX or UPS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BingEx Limited (FLX) is the stronger pick with -1.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLX or UPS?
On forward P/E, BingEx Limited is actually cheaper at 1.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLX or UPS?
Over the past 5 years, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) delivered a total return of -40. 0%, compared to -84. 8% for BingEx Limited (FLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPS returned +44. 7% versus FLX's -84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLX or UPS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus BingEx Limited's 1. 48β — meaning FLX is approximately 64% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BingEx Limited (FLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLX or UPS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BingEx Limited (FLX) is pulling ahead at -1.
3% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Parcel Service, Inc. grew EPS -3. 0% year-over-year, compared to -402. 0% for BingEx Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLX leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLX or UPS?
United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -3. 3% for BingEx Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPS leads at 9. 6% versus -0. 6% for FLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPS leads at 18. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLX or UPS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BingEx Limited (FLX) trades at 1.
0x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for United Parcel Service, Inc. — 13. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLX or UPS?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield) pays a dividend. FLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLX or UPS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, FLX: -84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLX and UPS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. UPS pays a dividend while FLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FLX: -12.9% · UPS: -1.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.