FLX
BingEx Limited
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$124M
5Y Perf.-78.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLX vs ZTO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Market Cap$20.24B
5Y Perf.+9.7%
FLX vs ZTO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLX | ZTO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $124M | $20.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.02B | $46.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-207M | $8.71B |
| Gross Margin | 11.5% | 27.5% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.0x | 1.9x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $17.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $592M | $13.47B |
FLX vs ZTO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLX
ZTO
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BingEx Limited (FLX) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
| ZTO Express (Cayman… (ZTO) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLX vs ZTO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: ZTO leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. BingEx Limited is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLX
BingEx Limited
The Defensive Pick
FLX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 1.87x
- Lower P/E (1.0x vs 1.9x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ZTO
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
The Income Pick
ZTO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth 15.3%, EPS growth 0.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 74.6% 10Y total return vs FLX's -84.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | ZTO | 15.3% revenue growth vs FLX's -1.3% |
| Value | FLX | Lower P/E (1.0x vs 1.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | ZTO | 18.8% margin vs FLX's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | ZTO | Beta 0.36 vs FLX's 1.48 |
| Dividends | ZTO | 3.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | ZTO | +37.8% vs FLX's +13.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | ZTO | 9.3% ROA vs FLX's -16.9%, ROIC 13.6% vs -9.8% |
FLX vs ZTO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
FLX vs ZTO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLZTOLAGGINGFLX
FLXBingEx Limited
1leads
ZTOZTO Express (Cayman) …
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLXMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
ZTO5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLX4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
ZTO5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
ZTO6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
ZTO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTO is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.3B annually — 11.5x FLX's $4.0B. ZTO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLX's -5.2%. On growth, ZTO holds the edge at +10.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $46.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$109M | $11.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$207M | $8.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +27.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.0% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.9% | +10.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -25.0% |
ZTO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44M | $20.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.47x | 16.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.95x | 1.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.59x | 2.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 808.01x | 24.92x |
FLX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZTO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZTO delivers a 13.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-26 for FLX. FLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTO's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZTO scores 6/9 vs FLX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.3% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.9% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.8% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.6% | +17.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$550M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $592M | $13.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $17.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 38.64x |
ZTO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ZTO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ZTO five years ago would be worth $8,750 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,516 for FLX. Over the past 12 months, ZTO leads with a +37.8% total return vs FLX's +13.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZTO at -1.1% vs FLX's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.2% | +19.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.8% | +37.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | -3.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | -12.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | +74.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | -1.1% |
ZTO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ZTO is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLX's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZTO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs FLX's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.45 | $26.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.08 | $16.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 192K | 1.5M |
ZTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
ZTO is the only dividend payer here at 3.88% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FLXBingEx Limited | ZTOZTO Express (Caym… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
ZTO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLX vs ZTO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLX or ZTO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) is the stronger pick with 15. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for BingEx Limited (FLX). ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) offers the better valuation at 16. 1x trailing P/E (1. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (ZTO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FLX or ZTO?
On forward P/E, BingEx Limited is actually cheaper at 1.
0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FLX or ZTO?
Over the past 5 years, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) delivered a total return of -12. 5%, compared to -84. 8% for BingEx Limited (FLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZTO returned +74. 6% versus FLX's -84. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FLX or ZTO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus BingEx Limited's 1. 48β — meaning FLX is approximately 307% more volatile than ZTO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BingEx Limited (FLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 28% for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FLX or ZTO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) is pulling ahead at 15. 3% versus -1. 3% for BingEx Limited (FLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. grew EPS 0. 9% year-over-year, compared to -402. 0% for BingEx Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLX leads at 13. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FLX or ZTO?
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 9% net margin versus -3. 3% for BingEx Limited — meaning it keeps 19. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTO leads at 26. 6% versus -0. 6% for FLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTO leads at 31. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FLX or ZTO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, BingEx Limited (FLX) trades at 1.
0x forward P/E versus 1. 9x for ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — FLX or ZTO?
In this comparison, ZTO (3.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FLX or ZTO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
(ZTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 36), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTO: +74. 6%, FLX: -84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FLX and ZTO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZTO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ZTO pays a dividend while FLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FLX: -12.9% · ZTO: 10.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.