Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$295M
5Y Perf.+45.3%
LOVE
The Lovesac Company

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$228M
5Y Perf.-42.9%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$554M
5Y Perf.-29.3%
HOFT
Hooker Furnishings Corporation

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$138M
5Y Perf.-15.8%
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-19.4%

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLXS logoFLXS
LOVE logoLOVE
ETH logoETH
HOFT logoHOFT
LZB logoLZB
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesAsset Management - CryptocurrencyFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$295M$228M$554M$138M$1.46B
Revenue (TTM)$458M$690M$615M$376M$2.13B
Net Income (TTM)$22M$13M$47M$-13M$84M
Gross Margin23.2%57.7%60.5%22.4%43.5%
Operating Margin6.1%6.3%10.1%-4.8%5.5%
Forward P/E11.9x25.7x8.5x13.5x
Total Debt$59M$183M$124M$70M$491M
Cash & Equiv.$40M$84M$76M$6M$328M

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLXS
LOVE
ETH
HOFT
LZB
StockJul 24May 26Return
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100145.3+45.3%
The Lovesac Company (LOVE)10057.1-42.9%
Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH)10070.7-29.3%
Hooker Furnishings … (HOFT)10084.2-15.8%
La-Z-Boy Incorporat… (LZB)10080.6-19.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FLXS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. HOFT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

FLXS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
  • 6.9% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
  • +80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5%
  • 7.5% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs -5.1%
Best for: growth exposure
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

LOVE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
The Banking Pick

ETH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • PEG 0.20 vs LZB's 1.88
  • Lower P/E (8.5x vs 13.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.88
  • 8.4% margin vs HOFT's -3.4%
Best for: valuation efficiency
HOFT
Hooker Furnishings Corporation
The Income Pick

HOFT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 7.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 34.4%, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.73, yield 7.3%, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.73 vs ETH's 2.91
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder

LZB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 58.2% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 51.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLXS logoFLXS6.9% revenue growth vs HOFT's -8.3%
ValueETH logoETHLower P/E (8.5x vs 13.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.88
Quality / MarginsETH logoETH8.4% margin vs HOFT's -3.4%
Stability / SafetyHOFT logoHOFTBeta 0.73 vs ETH's 2.91
DividendsHOFT logoHOFT7.3% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs LZB's 2.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5%
Efficiency (ROA)FLXS logoFLXS7.5% ROA vs HOFT's -4.6%, ROIC 9.9% vs -5.1%

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
LOVEThe Lovesac Company
FY 2025
Sactionals Member
91.4%$622M
Sacs Member
7.2%$49M
Other Operating Segment
1.5%$10M
ETHGrayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
FY 2025
Upholstery Furniture
48.9%$301M
Case Goods Furniture
28.6%$176M
Accent
19.0%$117M
Manufactured Product, Other
3.5%$22M
HOFTHooker Furnishings Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

LZBLa-Z-Boy Incorporated
FY 2024
Stationary Upholstery Furniture
95.5%$2.0B
Delivery
10.0%$206M
Product and Service, Other
8.0%$164M
Bedroom Furniture
6.4%$131M
Wholesale Segment
-20.0%$-409,146,000

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFLXSLAGGINGLZB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LZB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 5.7x HOFT's $376M. ETH is the more profitable business, keeping 8.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOFT's -3.4%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$458M$690M$615M$376M$2.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$31M$58M$70M-$9M$243M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$13M$47M-$13M$84M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$28M-$11M$20M-$14M$158M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+23.2%+57.7%+60.5%+22.4%+43.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.1%+6.3%+10.1%-4.8%+5.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.8%+1.9%+8.4%-3.4%+3.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.1%-1.5%+0.0%-3.7%+7.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+2.5%-13.6%+3.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.2%-18.4%-28.1%-63.2%-23.5%
ETH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ETH and HOFT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 52% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs LZB's 2.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
Market CapShares × price$295M$228M$554M$138M$1.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$314M$327M$602M$202M$1.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.54x22.64x10.84x-10.72x15.13x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.90x25.68x8.55x13.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.25x2.10x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.38x11.54x9.71x6.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.67x0.34x0.90x0.35x0.69x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.87x1.21x1.16x0.66x1.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.74x13.06x9999.00x12.88x
Evenly matched — ETH and HOFT each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for HOFT. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs HOFT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%+6.5%+10.0%-6.6%+7.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.5%+2.6%+6.4%-4.6%+4.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.9%+3.3%+7.6%-5.1%+8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.3%+3.6%+10.5%-6.3%+9.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–985427
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.35x0.85x0.26x0.34x0.48x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$19M$99M$47M$64M$162M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$40M$84M$76M$6M$328M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$59M$183M$124M$70M$491M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense380.21x721.00x-13.29x241.20x
FLXS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,157 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs LOVE's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LOVE's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+38.7%+8.2%-26.1%+16.4%-4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+80.1%-23.5%+28.9%+57.7%-9.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+242.4%-40.1%-33.4%+1.3%+34.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+19.5%-78.4%-30.3%-56.7%-11.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+51.4%-34.9%-18.8%-20.5%+58.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+50.7%-15.7%-12.7%+0.4%+10.4%
FLXS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLXS and HOFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HOFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x1.33x2.91x0.73x0.97x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.95$21.90$45.78$15.99$44.49
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$29.38$10.33$16.85$8.46$29.03
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.0%+71.3%+47.6%+80.4%+79.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.453.755.846.254.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded47K299K4.6M43K382K
Evenly matched — FLXS and HOFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LOVE as "Buy", ETH as "Hold", HOFT as "Buy", LZB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for LOVE (target: $23) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, HOFT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.28% vs FLXS's 1.14%.

MetricFLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…LOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…HOFT logoHOFTHooker Furnishing…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$54.00$22.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts111029
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+0.0%+7.3%+2.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10104
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.63$0.00$0.94$0.83
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.0%+8.7%0.0%0.0%+5.4%
HOFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ETH leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallFlexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLXS vs LOVE vs ETH vs HOFT vs LZB: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.

8x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -78. 4% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LZB returned +58. 2% versus LOVE's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

73β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 297% more volatile than HOFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -8. 3% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -236. 4% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

4% net margin versus -3. 1% for Hooker Furnishings Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETH leads at 10. 1% versus -4. 6% for HOFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOVE: 44. 0% to $22. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB?

In this comparison, HOFT (7.

3% yield), LZB (2. 3% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LOVE, ETH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLXS or LOVE or ETH or HOFT or LZB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hooker Furnishings Corporation (HOFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

73), 7. 3% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOFT: -20. 5%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLXS and LOVE and ETH and HOFT and LZB?

These companies operate in different sectors (FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and HOFT (Consumer Cyclical) and LZB (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOFT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LZB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FLXS, HOFT, LZB pay a dividend while LOVE, ETH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LOVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ETH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOFT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LZB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLXS and LOVE and ETH and HOFT and LZB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLXS: 9.8% · LOVE: 2.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLXS: 15.5x · LOVE: 22.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.