Auto - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLYE vs UBER
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
FLYE vs UBER — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3M | $151.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $52.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $10.05B |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | 39.8% |
| Operating Margin | -38.1% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.5x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $13.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $840K | $7.74B |
FLYE vs UBER — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fly-E Group, Inc. C… (FLYE) | 100 | 0.4 | -99.6% |
| Uber Technologies, … (UBER) | 100 | 108.9 | +8.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLYE vs UBER
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, FLYE is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
UBER carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.09
- Rev growth 18.3%, EPS growth 3.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 75.5% 10Y total return vs FLYE's -99.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.3% revenue growth vs FLYE's -21.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.3% margin vs FLYE's -53.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.09 vs FLYE's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -14.6% vs FLYE's -94.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs FLYE's -27.0%, ROIC 13.6% vs -13.2% |
FLYE vs UBER — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLYE vs UBER — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBER is the larger business by revenue, generating $52.0B annually — 3071.1x FLYE's $17M. UBER is the more profitable business, keeping 19.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLYE's -53.1%. On growth, UBER holds the edge at +20.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $52.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$302,514 | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $10.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $9.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +39.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.1% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.1% | +19.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -86.8% | +18.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.3% | +20.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.6% | -95.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FLYE leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLYE's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UBER's 25.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $151.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $157.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.09x | 15.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.67x | 24.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 5.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UBER delivers a 35.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-60 for FLYE. UBER carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLYE's 1.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UBER scores 7/9 vs FLYE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.1% | +35.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -27.0% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.6% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.94x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18M | -$6.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $840,102 | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $13.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.87x | 17.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UBER leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UBER five years ago would be worth $14,254 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43 for FLYE. Over the past 12 months, UBER leads with a -14.6% total return vs FLYE's -94.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UBER at 24.6% vs FLYE's -83.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -75.5% | -12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.9% | -14.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +93.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +42.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +75.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.8% | +24.6% |
Risk & Volatility
UBER leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UBER is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLYE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UBER currently trades 71.5% from its 52-week high vs FLYE's 1.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $161.80 | $101.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.68 | $68.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.3% | +71.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 15.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $104.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.3% |
UBER leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLYE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FLYE vs UBER: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLYE or UBER a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger pick with 18. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 0% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock (FLYE). Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (23. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLYE or UBER?
Over the past 5 years, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) delivered a total return of +42. 5%, compared to -99. 6% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock (FLYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UBER returned +90. 4% versus FLYE's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLYE or UBER?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock's 1. 63β — meaning FLYE is approximately 50% more volatile than UBER relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 194% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FLYE or UBER?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is pulling ahead at 18. 3% versus -21. 0% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock (FLYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Uber Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 3. 3% year-over-year, compared to -379. 1% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock. Over a 3-year CAGR, UBER leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLYE or UBER?
Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 3% net margin versus -20. 8% for Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 19. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBER leads at 10. 7% versus -17. 9% for FLYE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLYE leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FLYE or UBER?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FLYE or UBER better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Uber Technologies, Inc.
(UBER) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09)). Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock (FLYE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UBER: +90. 4%, FLYE: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FLYE and UBER?
These companies operate in different sectors (FLYE (Consumer Cyclical) and UBER (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FLYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UBER is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.