Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FMBH vs MVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FMBH vs MVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $339M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $466M | $270M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $92M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 71.7% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $564M | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $257M | $244M |
FMBH vs MVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Mid Bancshare… (FMBH) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) | 100 | 185.8 | +85.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMBH vs MVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMBH is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 15.2x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6%
MVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 34.6%
- 135.5% 10Y total return vs FMBH's 107.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% NII/revenue growth vs FMBH's 4.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs FMBH's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, vs FMBH's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs FMBH's +24.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs MVBF's 0.6% |
FMBH vs MVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FMBH vs MVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMBH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMBH is the larger business by revenue, generating $466M annually — 1.7x MVBF's $270M. FMBH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MVBF's 10.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $466M | $270M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $39M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $92M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +71.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.8% | -55.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FMBH and MVBF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.4x trailing earnings, FMBH trades at a 11% valuation discount to MVBF's 12.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MVBF's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FMBH's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $339M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $172M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.41x | 12.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.40x | 15.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.58x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.57x | 4.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 1.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.38x | 160.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MVBF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FMBH delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for MVBF. MVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FMBH's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MVBF scores 7/9 vs FMBH's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +8.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.9% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $308M | -$167M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $257M | $244M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $564M | $77M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.00x | 0.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FMBH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FMBH five years ago would be worth $11,015 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,234 for MVBF. Over the past 12 months, MVBF leads with a +53.4% total return vs FMBH's +24.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FMBH at 26.3% vs MVBF's 18.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.8% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.7% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.7% | +65.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +107.3% | +135.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FMBH and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MVBF is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMBH's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMBH currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs MVBF's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.85 | $29.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.67 | $17.13 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +89.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 111K | 34K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FMBH and MVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMBH as "Hold" and MVBF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for MVBF (target: $30) vs 13.6% for FMBH (target: $50). For income investors, MVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs FMBH's 2.23%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.67 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $0.66 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% |
FMBH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MVBF leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FMBH vs MVBF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMBH or MVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 2% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH). First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH) offers the better valuation at 11. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMBH or MVBF?
On trailing P/E, First Mid Bancshares, Inc.
(FMBH) is the cheapest at 11. 4x versus MVB Financial Corp. at 12. 8x. On forward P/E, First Mid Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMBH or MVBF?
Over the past 5 years, First Mid Bancshares, Inc.
(FMBH) delivered a total return of +10. 2%, compared to -27. 7% for MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MVBF returned +135. 5% versus FMBH's +107. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMBH or MVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus First Mid Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning FMBH is approximately 9% more volatile than MVBF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 59% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMBH or MVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 4. 2% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MVB Financial Corp. grew EPS 34. 6% year-over-year, compared to 16. 1% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMBH or MVBF?
First Mid Bancshares, Inc.
(FMBH) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 7% net margin versus 10. 0% for MVB Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FMBH leads at 25. 1% versus 13. 6% for MVBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMBH leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMBH or MVBF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Mid Bancshares, Inc.
(FMBH) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for MVB Financial Corp. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVBF: 13. 7% to $30. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMBH or MVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
MVB Financial Corp. (MVBF) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 2. 2% for First Mid Bancshares, Inc. (FMBH).
09Is FMBH or MVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MVB Financial Corp.
(MVBF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 2. 5% yield, +135. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MVBF: +135. 5%, FMBH: +107. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMBH and MVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMBH is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVBF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.