Beverages - Alcoholic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FMX vs CCEP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
FMX vs CCEP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Alcoholic | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $4.14B | $41.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $841.93B | $41.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20.06B | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 20.7x |
| Total Debt | $257.98B | $11.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108.52B | $918M |
FMX vs CCEP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fomento Económico M… (FMX) | 100 | 177.1 | +77.1% |
| Coca-Cola Europacif… (CCEP) | 100 | 248.0 | +148.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FMX vs CCEP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FMX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 64.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 78.2%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.34, yield 64.8%, current ratio 1.35x
CCEP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -1.8%, EPS growth 32.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- 129.4% 10Y total return vs FMX's 63.3%
- -1.8% revenue growth vs FMX's -94.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.8% revenue growth vs FMX's -94.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 20.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs FMX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs FMX's 0.34 | |
| Dividends | 64.8% yield, vs CCEP's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.7% vs CCEP's +5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs FMX's 2.4%, ROIC 10.4% vs 0.6% |
FMX vs CCEP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FMX vs CCEP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCEP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $841.9B annually — 20.4x CCEP's $41.3B. CCEP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FMX's 2.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $841.9B | $41.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $71.8B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20.1B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $21.3B | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +10.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.7% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +69.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FMX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, FMX trades at a 78% valuation discount to CCEP's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCEP's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FMX's 23.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.1B | $41.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $153.6B | $54.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.36x | 19.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.36x | 20.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.81x | 13.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 1.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 4.37x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.55x | 18.32x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCEP leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCEP delivers a 40.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $6 for FMX. FMX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCEP's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCEP scores 6/9 vs FMX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.8% | +40.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $149.5B | $10.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108.5B | $918M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $258.0B | $11.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.89x | 9.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CCEP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CCEP five years ago would be worth $18,167 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,270 for FMX. Over the past 12 months, FMX leads with a +22.7% total return vs CCEP's +5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CCEP at 15.2% vs FMX's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.5% | +6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | +5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.7% | +81.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.3% | +129.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.7% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FMX and CCEP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CCEP is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FMX's 0.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FMX currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs CCEP's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $124.24 | $110.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $83.08 | $84.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +84.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 48.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 412K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
FMX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FMX as "Buy" and CCEP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.3% upside for CCEP (target: $111) vs -3.3% for FMX (target: $116). For income investors, FMX offers the higher dividend yield at 64.75% vs CCEP's 2.45%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.00 | $110.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +64.8% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $77.65 | $1.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +15.5% | +2.8% |
CCEP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FMX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FMX vs CCEP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FMX or CCEP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the stronger pick with -1.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 8% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FMX or CCEP?
On trailing P/E, Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.
A. B. de C. V. (FMX) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FMX or CCEP?
Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) delivered a total return of +81.
7%, compared to +72. 7% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CCEP returned +129. 4% versus FMX's +63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FMX or CCEP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
13β versus Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 34β — meaning FMX is approximately 173% more volatile than CCEP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 135% for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FMX or CCEP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is pulling ahead at -1.
8% versus -94. 8% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC grew EPS 32. 8% year-over-year, compared to -96. 3% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCEP leads at 5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FMX or CCEP?
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
3% net margin versus 2. 3% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 9. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCEP leads at 12. 9% versus 8. 6% for FMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMX leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FMX or CCEP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.
A. B. de C. V. (FMX) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 7x for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC — 19. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCEP: 18. 3% to $110. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — FMX or CCEP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) offers the highest yield at 64. 8%, versus 2. 5% for Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP).
09Is FMX or CCEP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC (CCEP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
13), 2. 5% yield, +129. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCEP: +129. 4%, FMX: +63. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FMX and CCEP?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CCEP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.