FMX vs COKE

For growth investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -94. 8% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (1. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.

A. B. de C. V. (FMX) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. at 26. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) delivered a total return of +530. 9%, compared to +72. 7% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COKE returned +1005% versus FMX's +63. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. 's 0. 34β — meaning FMX is approximately 97% more volatile than COKE relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -94. 8% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. grew EPS -2. 6% year-over-year, compared to -96. 3% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COKE leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus 2. 3% for Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COKE leads at 13. 2% versus 8. 6% for FMX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FMX leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fomento Económico Mexicano, S. A. B. de C. V. (FMX) offers the highest yield at 64. 8%, versus 0. 6% for Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.

(COKE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 18), 0. 6% yield, +1005% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COKE: +1005%, FMX: +63. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; COKE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.