Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $6.40B | $4.56B | $4.61B | $3.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.69B | $1.05B | $739M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $565M | $418M | $243M | $287M |
| Gross Margin | 62.3% | 78.3% | 70.8% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.8% | 49.4% | 36.8% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 10.9x | 15.9x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $705M | $197M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.50B | $536M | $763M | $1.33B |
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| F.N.B. Corporation (FNB) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
| International Bancs… (IBOC) | 100 | 238.0 | +138.0% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FNB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth 22.8%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 11.8x)
IBOC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 1.9%
- 229.3% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 21.7%, current ratio 1.04x
- PEG 0.53 vs FFIN's 3.05
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1%
- 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.7% vs FFIN's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs WSFS's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 11.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs FNB's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs IBOC's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5% |
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBOC leads in 1 of 6 categories
FFIN leads 1 • WSFS leads 1 • FNB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FNB is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.7B annually — 3.6x FFIN's $739M. IBOC is the more profitable business, keeping 39.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNB's 21.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $1.1B | $739M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $724M | $417M | $310M | $408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $565M | $418M | $243M | $287M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $277M | $360M | $290M | $214M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.3% | +78.3% | +70.8% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +49.4% | +36.8% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +39.1% | +30.2% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +47.0% | +39.6% | +15.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.7% | -100.0% | -7.7% | +22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FNB and IBOC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, IBOC trades at a 47% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBOC offers better value at 0.54x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $4.6B | $4.6B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.8B | $4.7B | $4.0B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.49x | 11.07x | 20.76x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.41x | 10.87x | 15.92x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.89x | 0.54x | 3.98x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.69x | 8.69x | 14.17x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.38x | 4.32x | 6.23x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 1.40x | 2.89x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.21x | 15.73x | 17.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for FNB. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FNB's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FNB scores 7/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +13.2% | +13.3% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +3.4% | +1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +10.5% | +11.0% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +5.4% | +16.0% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.22x | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $168M | -$566M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.5B | $536M | $763M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $705M | $197M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 1.91x | 1.48x | 1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBOC five years ago would be worth $16,131 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | +10.7% | +8.5% | +31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.3% | +20.1% | -3.2% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.2% | +88.6% | +29.1% | +135.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.2% | +61.3% | -28.2% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.8% | +229.3% | +145.4% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.4% | +23.5% | +8.9% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBOC and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBOC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FNB's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.83x | 0.95x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.14 | $75.44 | $38.74 | $73.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.44 | $61.15 | $28.11 | $49.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +97.1% | +83.6% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 59.5 | 58.2 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 373K | 740K | 385K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBOC and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FNB as "Buy", IBOC as "Buy", FFIN as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 3.6% for WSFS (target: $75). For income investors, FFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.22% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.50 | $85.00 | $39.25 | $74.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 1 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +2.2% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.40 | $0.72 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +7.6% |
IBOC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). FFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
FNB vs IBOC vs FFIN vs WSFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
On trailing P/E, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, F. N. B. Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: International Bancshares Corporation wins at 0. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
Over the past 5 years, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) delivered a total return of +61.
3%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBOC returned +229. 3% versus FNB's +78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus F. N. B. Corporation's 1. 22β — meaning FNB is approximately 48% more volatile than IBOC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 58% for F. N. B. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -3. 1% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: F. N. B. Corporation grew EPS 22. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 8% for International Bancshares Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
1% net margin versus 21. 0% for F. N. B. Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBOC leads at 49. 4% versus 24. 8% for FNB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBOC leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 53x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS?
In this comparison, FFIN (2.
2% yield), IBOC (1. 9% yield), WSFS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FNB or IBOC or FFIN or WSFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Bancshares Corporation (IBOC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 1. 9% yield, +229. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBOC: +229. 3%, FNB: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FNB and IBOC and FFIN and WSFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FNB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBOC is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock. IBOC, FFIN, WSFS pay a dividend while FNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.