Home Improvement
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FND vs LOW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
FND vs LOW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $5.22B | $126.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.68B | $86.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $199M | $6.65B |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 24.4x | 17.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.63B | $7.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $249M | $982M |
FND vs LOW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor & Decor Holdi… (FND) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| Lowe's Companies, I… (LOW) | 100 | 179.0 | +79.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FND vs LOW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FND is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 1.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- 5.1% revenue growth vs LOW's 3.1%
LOW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.1%
- 240.6% 10Y total return vs FND's 50.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, current ratio 1.08x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% revenue growth vs LOW's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.9x vs 24.4x), PEG 2.02 vs 28.60 | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs FND's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs FND's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 16-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.2% vs FND's -34.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs FND's 3.9%, ROIC 76.2% vs 4.4% |
FND vs LOW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FND vs LOW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $86.3B annually — 18.5x FND's $4.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.7% (LOW) to 4.3% (FND). On growth, LOW holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $86.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $443M | $12.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $199M | $6.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $105M | $7.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +8.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +10.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | -11.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LOW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.0x trailing earnings, LOW trades at a 24% valuation discount to FND's 25.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LOW offers better value at 2.14x vs FND's 28.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $126.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.6B | $132.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.16x | 19.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.45x | 17.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 28.60x | 2.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.72x | 10.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.11x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.17x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 81.49x | 16.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOW scores 6/9 vs FND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +76.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.9% | +33.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.51x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249M | $982M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.6B | $7.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.72x | 8.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LOW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LOW five years ago would be worth $12,322 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,291 for FND. Over the past 12 months, LOW leads with a +2.2% total return vs FND's -34.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOW at 5.1% vs FND's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -34.7% | +2.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.8% | +16.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.1% | +23.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +240.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.5% | +5.1% |
Risk & Volatility
LOW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FND's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LOW currently trades 76.9% from its 52-week high vs FND's 52.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $92.41 | $293.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.47 | $210.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.3% | +76.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 34.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
LOW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FND as "Hold" and LOW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.8% upside for FND (target: $63) vs 28.0% for LOW (target: $288). LOW is the only dividend payer here at 2.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.18 | $288.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 51 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
LOW leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
FND vs LOW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FND or LOW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is the stronger pick with 5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) offers the better valuation at 19. 0x trailing P/E (17. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FND or LOW?
On trailing P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the cheapest at 19. 0x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. at 25. 2x. On forward P/E, Lowe's Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lowe's Companies, Inc. wins at 2. 02x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 28. 60x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FND or LOW?
Over the past 5 years, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -57. 1% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOW returned +240. 6% versus FND's +50. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FND or LOW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning FND is approximately 108% more volatile than LOW relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FND or LOW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
(FND) is pulling ahead at 5. 1% versus 3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1. 1% year-over-year, compared to -3. 1% for Lowe's Companies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FND leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FND or LOW?
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus 4. 5% for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOW leads at 11. 8% versus 5. 9% for FND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FND leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FND or LOW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 02x versus Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. 's 28. 60x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW) trades at 17. 9x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FND: 30. 8% to $63. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — FND or LOW?
In this comparison, LOW (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. FND does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FND or LOW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lowe's Companies, Inc.
(LOW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 1% yield, +240. 6% 10Y return). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOW: +240. 6%, FND: +50. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FND and LOW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LOW pays a dividend while FND does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.