Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FONR vs GEHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
FONR vs GEHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $124M | $27.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $106M | $19.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $1.50B |
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | 42.5% |
| Operating Margin | 10.1% | 12.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $10.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $4.51B |
FONR vs GEHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FONAR Corporation (FONR) | 100 | 112.7 | +12.7% |
| GE HealthCare Techn… (GEHC) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FONR vs GEHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FONR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.10
- 35.0% 10Y total return vs GEHC's 2.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.10, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 8.45x
GEHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 4.8% revenue growth vs FONR's 1.4%
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 15.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs FONR's 1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs FONR's 7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs GEHC's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.4% vs GEHC's -10.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs FONR's 3.5%, ROIC 13.3% vs 6.1% |
FONR vs GEHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FONR vs GEHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEHC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.0B annually — 188.2x FONR's $106M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.5% (GEHC) to 7.1% (FONR). On growth, GEHC holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106M | $20.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $3.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +42.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +12.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -30.9% |
Valuation Metrics
FONR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, GEHC trades at a 12% valuation discount to FONR's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FONR's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEHC's 10.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $124M | $27.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $106M | $33.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.35x | 13.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 19.78x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.52x | 10.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 2.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.61x | 18.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FONR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEHC delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for FONR. FONR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GEHC's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FONR scores 7/9 vs GEHC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +13.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 705.24x | 5.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FONR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FONR five years ago would be worth $10,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,293 for GEHC. Over the past 12 months, FONR leads with a +53.4% total return vs GEHC's -10.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FONR at 4.6% vs GEHC's -8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -25.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.4% | -10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.3% | -22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.8% | +2.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.0% | +2.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.6% | -8.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FONR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FONR is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEHC's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FONR currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs GEHC's 68.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.10x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.95 | $89.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.17 | $58.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 32.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 52K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
GEHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GEHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $84.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +0.7% |
FONR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GEHC leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
FONR vs GEHC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FONR or GEHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
(GEHC) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for FONAR Corporation (FONR). GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FONR or GEHC?
On trailing P/E, GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
(GEHC) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus FONAR Corporation at 15. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FONR or GEHC?
Over the past 5 years, FONAR Corporation (FONR) delivered a total return of +9.
8%, compared to +2. 9% for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (GEHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FONR returned +35. 0% versus GEHC's +2. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FONR or GEHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FONAR Corporation (FONR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning GEHC is approximately 1210% more volatile than FONR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FONAR Corporation (FONR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 94% for GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FONR or GEHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
(GEHC) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus 1. 4% for FONAR Corporation (FONR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for FONAR Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEHC leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FONR or GEHC?
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
(GEHC) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus 8. 0% for FONAR Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEHC leads at 13. 4% versus 11. 1% for FONR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FONR leads at 81. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FONR or GEHC?
In this comparison, GEHC (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FONR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FONR or GEHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FONAR Corporation (FONR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FONR: +35. 0%, GEHC: +2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FONR and GEHC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.