FOX vs NWSA

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.

5x versus News Corporation at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x.

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOX) delivered a total return of +58.

9%, compared to +2. 1% for News Corporation (NWSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 3% versus FOX's +105. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

51β versus News Corporation's 0. 59β — meaning NWSA is approximately 16% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOX leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus 13. 9% for Fox Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOX leads at 19. 8% versus 11. 3% for NWSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOX) trades at 12.

2x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for News Corporation — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 50. 2% to $85. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

News Corporation (NWSA) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Fox Corporation (FOX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

51), 1. 1% yield, +105. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +105. 3%, NWSA: +136. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.