Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $13.28B | $67.98B | $192.60B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.58B | $37.21B | $97.26B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.89B | $-2.15B | $11.22B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 41.5% | 37.2% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | -4.0% | 15.5% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.2x | 93.5x | 16.5x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.46B | $32.57B | $44.88B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.35B | $4.57B | $5.70B | $9.03B |
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Corporation (FOX) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.1%
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- PEG 0.49 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.91x
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs FOX's 104.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- Beta 0.39 vs WBD's 0.90, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.2x vs 24.8x), PEG 0.49 vs 0.75 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs WBD's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
FOX leads 2 • WBD leads 0 • DIS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 5.9x FOX's $16.6B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $37.2B | $97.3B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $7.5B | $20.5B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | -$2.2B | $11.2B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $2.3B | $7.1B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +41.5% | +37.2% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | -4.0% | +15.5% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | -5.8% | +11.5% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +6.2% | +7.3% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -1.0% | +6.5% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | -5.5% | -29.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FOX leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FOX trades at a 88% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FOX offers better value at 0.46x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.3B | $68.0B | $192.6B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.4B | $96.0B | $231.8B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.51x | 93.52x | 15.87x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.20x | — | 16.53x | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.26x | 13.73x | 12.10x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 1.82x | 2.04x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.11x | 1.85x | 1.72x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.44x | 22.02x | 19.11x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOX scores 8/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | -5.9% | +9.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | -2.2% | +5.6% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | +1.5% | +6.9% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +1.5% | +8.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.88x | 0.39x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $28.0B | $39.2B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $4.6B | $5.7B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $32.6B | $44.9B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.91x | 3.56x | 9.95x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs DIS's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -4.9% | -2.8% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.6% | +216.8% | +7.7% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.6% | +101.5% | +8.0% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.0% | -27.8% | -39.8% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +104.9% | -3.7% | +11.8% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.3% | +26.3% | +2.6% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBD and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.90x | 0.90x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.17 | $30.00 | $124.69 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.26 | $8.06 | $92.19 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.9% | +90.4% | +87.2% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 48.9 | 64.4 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 22.2M | 9.1M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
FOX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOX as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", DIS as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.8% upside for FOX (target: $79) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, FOX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $79.00 | $29.94 | $139.50 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 32 | 63 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.5% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FOX vs WBD vs DIS vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Walt Disney Company (DIS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fox Corporation wins at 0. 49x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 132% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOX) trades at 12. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 39. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX?
In this comparison, FOX (1.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WBD, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOX or WBD or DIS or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOX and WBD and DIS and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. FOX, DIS pay a dividend while WBD, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.