Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Entertainment
Entertainment
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $13.94B | $96.34B | $68.18B | $191.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.58B | $125.28B | $37.30B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.89B | $18.60B | $727M | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 61.7% | 40.3% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 15.3% | 2.5% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.4x | 7.5x | 93.8x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $7.46B | $110.44B | $32.57B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.35B | $9.48B | $4.57B | $5.70B |
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Corporation (FOXA) | 100 | 213.3 | +113.3% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.8 | -33.2% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 29.7% 10Y total return vs CMCSA's 16.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
- 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs FOXA's 0.54
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.4x)
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs WBD's 1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +222.7% vs CMCSA's -19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs WBD's 0.7%, ROIC 16.5% vs 1.5% |
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FOXA leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FOXA and CMCSA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 7.6x FOXA's $16.6B. CMCSA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's 1.9%. On growth, DIS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $125.3B | $37.3B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $35.4B | $13.4B | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $18.6B | $727M | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $18.1B | $3.1B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +61.7% | +40.3% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +15.3% | +2.5% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +14.8% | +1.9% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +14.5% | +8.3% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +5.3% | -5.7% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | -32.6% | +50.0% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs FOXA's 0.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.9B | $96.3B | $68.2B | $191.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.0B | $197.3B | $96.2B | $230.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.67x | 4.91x | 93.79x | 15.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.40x | 7.49x | — | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | 0.26x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.44x | 5.35x | 13.75x | 12.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 0.78x | 1.83x | 2.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 0.99x | 1.85x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.66x | 4.40x | 22.08x | 18.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOXA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMCSA delivers a 19.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $2 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +19.5% | +2.0% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +6.9% | +0.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | +8.2% | +1.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +8.9% | +1.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 1.13x | 0.88x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $101.0B | $28.0B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $9.5B | $4.6B | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $110.4B | $32.6B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.74x | 6.84x | 1.79x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,250 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,626 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +222.7% total return vs CMCSA's -19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.4% vs CMCSA's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.3% | -8.3% | -4.6% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.7% | -19.5% | +222.7% | +18.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.4% | -25.9% | +102.1% | +7.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.5% | -43.7% | -25.0% | -39.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.7% | +16.0% | -3.8% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.7% | -9.5% | +26.4% | +2.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMCSA and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs CMCSA's 72.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.21x | 0.90x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.39 | $36.66 | $30.00 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $48.89 | $25.75 | $8.06 | $91.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.4% | +72.1% | +90.7% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 37.9 | 50.0 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 28.4M | 22.4M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOXA as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.2% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 10.1% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.09% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.17 | $31.87 | $29.94 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 60 | 32 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +5.1% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 18 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $1.35 | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | +7.4% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
CMCSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). FOXA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FOXA vs CMCSA vs WBD vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) a "Buy" — based on 60 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 8x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +72.
5%, compared to -43. 7% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOXA returned +29. 7% versus WBD's -3. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 331% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 30. 2% for Comcast Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Fox Corporation's 0. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for The Walt Disney Company — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 29. 2% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), FOXA (1. 0% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOXA or CMCSA or WBD or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +16. 0%, WBD: -3. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXA and CMCSA and WBD and DIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FOXA, CMCSA, DIS pay a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.