Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FOXA vs NWSA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FOXA
Fox Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$14.04B
5Y Perf.+114.9%
NWSA
News Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15.27B
5Y Perf.+120.7%

FOXA vs NWSA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FOXA logoFOXA
NWSA logoNWSA
IndustryEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$14.04B$15.27B
Revenue (TTM)$16.58B$9.03B
Net Income (TTM)$1.89B$1.69B
Gross Margin33.1%34.9%
Operating Margin19.0%7.8%
Forward P/E13.5x25.8x
Total Debt$7.46B$2.94B
Cash & Equiv.$5.35B$2.40B

FOXA vs NWSALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FOXA
NWSA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Fox Corporation (FOXA)100214.9+114.9%
News Corporation (NWSA)100220.7+120.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FOXA vs NWSA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FOXA leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. News Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FOXA
Fox Corporation
The Income Pick

FOXA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 1.0%
  • Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NWSA
News Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

NWSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 136.5% 10Y total return vs FOXA's 30.6%
  • 18.7% margin vs FOXA's 11.4%
  • 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFOXA logoFOXA16.6% revenue growth vs NWSA's 2.4%
ValueFOXA logoFOXALower P/E (13.5x vs 25.8x)
Quality / MarginsNWSA logoNWSA18.7% margin vs FOXA's 11.4%
Stability / SafetyFOXA logoFOXABeta 0.54 vs NWSA's 0.60
DividendsNWSA logoNWSA1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%
Momentum (1Y)FOXA logoFOXA+24.5% vs NWSA's -3.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NWSA logoNWSA10.9% ROA vs FOXA's 8.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs 16.5%

FOXA vs NWSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FOXAFox Corporation
FY 2025
Television Segment
57.4%$9.3B
Cable Network Programming Segment
42.6%$6.9B
NWSANews Corporation
FY 2025
Dow Jones Segment
27.6%$2.3B
News And Information Services Segment
25.7%$2.2B
Book Publishing Segment
25.4%$2.1B
Digital Real Estate Services Segment
21.3%$1.8B

FOXA vs NWSA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFOXALAGGINGNWSA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NWSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FOXA is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 1.8x NWSA's $9.0B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOXA's 11.4%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$16.6B$9.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.5B$469M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.9B$1.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2.5B$572M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.1%+34.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.0%+7.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.4%+18.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.3%+6.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.0%+8.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-35.8%+6.1%
NWSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FOXA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, FOXA trades at a 2% valuation discount to NWSA's 13.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOXA's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWSA's 11.2x.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Market CapShares × price$14.0B$15.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.2B$15.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.77x13.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.50x25.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.47x11.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.86x1.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.34x1.64x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.69x21.00x
FOXA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NWSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $17 for FOXA. NWSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOXA's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs NWSA's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.0%+18.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.8%+10.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.5%+6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+16.4%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x0.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.1B$537M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5.4B$2.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7.5B$2.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.74x127.43x
NWSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FOXA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,219 for NWSA. Over the past 12 months, FOXA leads with a +24.5% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOXA at 26.0% vs NWSA's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.6%+3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+24.5%-3.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+99.9%+61.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.4%+2.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+30.6%+136.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.0%+17.3%
FOXA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOXA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWSA's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWSA currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs FOXA's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.54x0.60x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$76.39$31.61
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$49.89$22.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.1%+85.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.258.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.3M4.1M
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FOXA as "Hold" and NWSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs 11.9% for FOXA (target: $70). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs FOXA's 0.96%.

MetricFOXA logoFOXAFox CorporationNWSA logoNWSANews Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$70.17$32.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts4828
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises31
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.1%+1.0%
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOXA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFox Corporation (FOXA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FOXA vs NWSA: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FOXA or NWSA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FOXA or NWSA?

On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.

8x versus News Corporation at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FOXA or NWSA?

Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.

4%, compared to +2. 2% for News Corporation (NWSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 5% versus FOXA's +30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FOXA or NWSA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

54β versus News Corporation's 0. 60β — meaning NWSA is approximately 11% more volatile than FOXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FOXA or NWSA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FOXA or NWSA?

News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

0% net margin versus 13. 9% for Fox Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 11. 3% for NWSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FOXA or NWSA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13.

5x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for News Corporation — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FOXA or NWSA?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

News Corporation (NWSA) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Fox Corporation (FOXA).

09

Is FOXA or NWSA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, FOXA: +30. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FOXA and NWSA?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FOXA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWSA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FOXA and NWSA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FOXA: 2.0% · NWSA: 8.9%)
Net Margin>
%
(FOXA: 11.4% · NWSA: 18.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FOXA: 12.8x · NWSA: 13.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.