Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXA vs NWSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
FOXA vs NWSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $14.04B | $15.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.58B | $9.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.89B | $1.69B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $7.46B | $2.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.35B | $2.40B |
FOXA vs NWSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Corporation (FOXA) | 100 | 214.9 | +114.9% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXA vs NWSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
NWSA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 136.5% 10Y total return vs FOXA's 30.6%
- 18.7% margin vs FOXA's 11.4%
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs NWSA's 2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs FOXA's 11.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs NWSA's 0.60 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.5% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs FOXA's 8.8%, ROIC 6.8% vs 16.5% |
FOXA vs NWSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOXA vs NWSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FOXA is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 1.8x NWSA's $9.0B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOXA's 11.4%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $9.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $469M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $572M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +18.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +8.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FOXA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, FOXA trades at a 2% valuation discount to NWSA's 13.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOXA's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NWSA's 11.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.0B | $15.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.2B | $15.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.77x | 13.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.50x | 25.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.47x | 11.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 1.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.34x | 1.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.69x | 21.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $17 for FOXA. NWSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOXA's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs NWSA's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $537M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.74x | 127.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FOXA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,219 for NWSA. Over the past 12 months, FOXA leads with a +24.5% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FOXA at 26.0% vs NWSA's 17.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.6% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | -3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.9% | +61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +2.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | +136.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +17.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOXA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWSA's 0.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NWSA currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs FOXA's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.39 | $31.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.89 | $22.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +85.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 58.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 4.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FOXA as "Hold" and NWSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for NWSA (target: $32) vs 11.9% for FOXA (target: $70). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs FOXA's 0.96%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.17 | $32.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +1.0% |
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOXA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FOXA vs NWSA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXA or NWSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXA or NWSA?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus News Corporation at 13. 1x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXA or NWSA?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to +2. 2% for News Corporation (NWSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 5% versus FOXA's +30. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXA or NWSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus News Corporation's 0. 60β — meaning NWSA is approximately 11% more volatile than FOXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 60% for Fox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXA or NWSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus 2. 4% for News Corporation (NWSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXA or NWSA?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus 13. 9% for Fox Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 11. 3% for NWSA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXA or NWSA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13.
5x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for News Corporation — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWSA: 19. 8% to $32. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXA or NWSA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
News Corporation (NWSA) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 0% for Fox Corporation (FOXA).
09Is FOXA or NWSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, FOXA: +30. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXA and NWSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.