Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $14.04B | $15.27B | $67.98B | $192.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.58B | $9.03B | $37.21B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.89B | $1.69B | $-2.15B | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 34.9% | 41.5% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 7.8% | -4.0% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.5x | 25.8x | 93.5x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $7.46B | $2.94B | $32.57B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.35B | $2.40B | $4.57B | $5.70B |
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Corporation (FOXA) | 100 | 214.9 | +114.9% |
| News Corporation (NWSA) | 100 | 220.7 | +120.7% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth 56.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
- Beta 0.54, yield 1.0%, current ratio 2.91x
NWSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 136.5% 10Y total return vs FOXA's 30.6%
- 18.7% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 10.9% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 6.8% vs 1.5%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NWSA's -3.3%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.7% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs WBD's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FOXA's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NWSA's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.9% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 6.8% vs 1.5% |
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories
FOXA leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWSA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 10.8x NWSA's $9.0B. NWSA is the more profitable business, keeping 18.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NWSA holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $9.0B | $37.2B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $469M | $7.5B | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.9B | $1.7B | -$2.2B | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.5B | $572M | $2.3B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +34.9% | +41.5% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +7.8% | -4.0% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +18.7% | -5.8% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +6.3% | +6.2% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | +8.9% | -1.0% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.8% | +6.1% | -5.5% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
FOXA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, FOXA trades at a 86% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FOXA's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.0B | $15.3B | $68.0B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.2B | $15.8B | $96.0B | $231.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.77x | 13.06x | 93.52x | 15.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.50x | 25.75x | — | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.47x | 11.17x | 13.73x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.86x | 1.81x | 1.82x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.34x | 1.64x | 1.85x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.69x | 21.00x | 22.02x | 19.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWSA delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. NWSA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXA scores 8/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.0% | +18.1% | -5.9% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +10.9% | -2.2% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | +6.8% | +1.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +7.2% | +1.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.31x | 0.88x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.1B | $537M | $28.0B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.4B | $2.4B | $4.6B | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.5B | $2.9B | $32.6B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.74x | 127.43x | 3.56x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOXA five years ago would be worth $17,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,017 for DIS. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NWSA's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs DIS's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.6% | +3.6% | -4.9% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.5% | -3.3% | +216.8% | +7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.9% | +61.3% | +101.5% | +8.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +2.2% | -27.8% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | +136.5% | -3.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +17.3% | +26.3% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOXA and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOXA is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs FOXA's 82.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.60x | 0.90x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $76.39 | $31.61 | $30.00 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.89 | $22.20 | $8.06 | $92.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.1% | +85.5% | +90.4% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 58.3 | 48.9 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 4.1M | 22.2M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FOXA and NWSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FOXA as "Hold", NWSA as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for DIS (target: $140) vs 10.4% for WBD (target: $30). For income investors, NWSA offers the higher dividend yield at 1.20% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.17 | $32.40 | $29.94 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 28 | 32 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +1.2% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | $0.32 | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
NWSA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FOXA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FOXA vs NWSA vs WBD vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOXA) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate News Corporation (NWSA) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the cheapest at 12.
8x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Fox Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOXA) delivered a total return of +70.
4%, compared to -39. 8% for The Walt Disney Company (DIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NWSA returned +136. 5% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 68% more volatile than FOXA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, News Corporation (NWSA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOXA) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: News Corporation grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXA leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
News Corporation (NWSA) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOXA leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWSA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fox Corporation (FOXA) trades at 13.
5x forward P/E versus 25. 8x for News Corporation — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIS: 28. 3% to $139. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS?
In this comparison, NWSA (1.
2% yield), FOXA (1. 0% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WBD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOXA or NWSA or WBD or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, News Corporation (NWSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
60), 1. 2% yield, +136. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NWSA: +136. 5%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXA and NWSA and WBD and DIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FOXA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NWSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FOXA, NWSA, DIS pay a dividend while WBD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.