Consumer Electronics
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Semiconductors
Software - Application
Semiconductors
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consumer Electronics | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors | Software - Application | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $33M | $22M | $4.00B | $157M | $213.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $17M | $446M | $0.00 | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-9M | $17M | $1M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 4.9% | 53.9% | — | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -13.9% | -50.0% | 4.6% | — | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 55.5x | 75.2x | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $12M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | — | $59M | $10M | $7.84B |
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foxx Development Ho… (FOXX) | 100 | 48.1 | -51.9% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
| Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN) | 100 | 249.0 | +149.0% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 153.2 | +53.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FOXX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.4%, EPS growth -212.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.3%
- 19.4% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0%
LIQT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, POWI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, current ratio 3.68x
- Beta 0.41 vs POWI's 2.08
- +193.2% vs FOXX's -15.8%
QCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.7%
- 350.2% 10Y total return vs IDN's 322.3%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (18.8x vs 75.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.4% revenue growth vs IDN's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 75.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs POWI's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +193.2% vs FOXX's -15.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 29.1% vs -31.1% |
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 4 of 6 categories
IDN leads 1 • FOXX leads 0 • LIQT leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM and IDN operate at a comparable scale, with $44.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $17M | $446M | $0 | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$6M | $41M | $2M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$9M | $17M | $1M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$7M | $85M | $4M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +4.9% | +53.9% | — | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.9% | -50.0% | +4.6% | — | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.3% | -53.3% | +3.7% | — | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | -39.3% | +18.9% | — | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | +53.6% | +2.6% | -3.7% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.4% | +69.4% | -60.0% | -43.3% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 40.4x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 78% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 15.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 79.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $22M | $4.0B | $157M | $213.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $34M | $3.9B | $148M | $222.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.27x | -2.59x | 184.18x | — | 40.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 55.51x | 75.22x | 18.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 19.44x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 79.69x | 72.52x | 15.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.49x | 1.35x | 9.02x | — | 4.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.14x | 6.01x | 7.59x | 10.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.93x | 35.01x | 16.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. QCOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIQT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOXX scores 7/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -70.0% | +2.4% | +6.8% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.3% | -29.5% | +2.1% | +5.2% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -31.1% | +2.4% | — | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | — | +2.9% | — | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.17x | — | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$676,940 | $12M | -$59M | -$10M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | — | $59M | $10M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $12M | $0 | $0 | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.45x | -13.46x | — | — | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QCOM five years ago would be worth $15,852 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $391 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, IDN leads with a +193.2% total return vs FOXX's -15.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDN at 51.7% vs FOXX's -23.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.5% | +54.9% | +93.2% | +17.5% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | +64.8% | +44.4% | +193.2% | +42.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.6% | -31.3% | -6.3% | +249.4% | +96.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | -96.1% | -8.3% | -4.1% | +58.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.1% | -90.9% | +232.7% | +322.3% | +350.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.2% | -11.8% | -2.2% | +51.7% | +25.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POWI and IDN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs FOXX's 54.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.52x | 2.08x | 0.41x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.88 | $3.35 | $78.94 | $9.07 | $223.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.71 | $1.30 | $30.86 | $2.60 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.1% | +68.9% | +91.0% | +85.7% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.9 | 57.0 | 76.1 | 51.0 | 80.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 50K | 967K | 384K | 15.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWI as "Buy", IDN as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs POWI's 1.17%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $79.00 | $8.50 | $175.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 7 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | 0 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
QCOM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IDN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
FOXX vs LIQT vs POWI vs IDN vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Foxx Development Holdings Inc.
(FOXX) is the stronger pick with 1941% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 40. 4x trailing P/E (18. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 40.
4x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 18. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) delivered a total return of +58.
5%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +350. 2% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning POWI is approximately 407% more volatile than IDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Foxx Development Holdings Inc.
(FOXX) is pulling ahead at 1941% versus -100. 0% for Intellicheck, Inc. (IDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellicheck, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -212. 8% for Foxx Development Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOXX leads at 72. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
5% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QCOM leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 18.
8x forward P/E versus 75. 2x for Intellicheck, Inc. — 56. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
7% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. FOXX, LIQT, IDN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FOXX or LIQT or POWI or IDN or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intellicheck, Inc.
(IDN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), +322. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IDN: +322. 3%, FOXX: -52. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FOXX and LIQT and POWI and IDN and QCOM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FOXX (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and IDN (Technology) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FOXX is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, QCOM pay a dividend while FOXX, LIQT, IDN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.